Hello again, Cryptokannon, thank you for your answer. I didn't hear about self-plagiarism, and I tried to search on the web. But the problem of that practice is linked to particular cases that can occur in specific fields (for example, Wikipedia tells about the academic field).

I understand what you mean and will consider what to do. On the other platform, I wrote an article also providing an example of why it is wrong to use a downvote in order to impose a personal policy, when the absence of a vote determines a value equal to 0 attributed to my post. But if these are the rules that the developers who built the platform allow, I can't do anything. When there is a system that allows you to obtain value from the publication of a post, using a tool such as a downvote based on a personal policy is something I consider deeply wrong.

Now, aside from your opinion, the most important thing for me is to understand if the Steemit team approves the policy of the zero-tolerance to the case mentioned by me, and if they have bots or larger curator accounts that don't accept publication in the way I described, and therefore I would start receiving downvotes on my posts as soon as I start posting them in that way. Do you have some information about this?

Then, I greet you and wish you a good day too. :)