I wouldn't be surprised if we see a class-action lawsuit from website owners against AI's unauthorised use of their content.
I agree. It's similar to when Google was sued by publishers and the RIAA. I expect they'll get sued and eventually reach some settlement that involves revenue sharing/royalties.
The new guidelines are about granting new copyrights for artists and writers who use AI, though. It's the output, not the input. Basically, I think Steem's curation decision-makers should follow similar rules to the Copyright office.
This position is hopefully where the article ended up - albeit without knowledge of the Copyright office.
The biggest challenge I’ve found is that whilst I know where my lines of acceptability are, others want a measurable metric. Something which removes subjectivity entirely. Which I keep saying is impossible. But I’ve tried. Always trying. Rarely succeeding.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed. That's why I posted it. I think it reinforces most of what you wrote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
👍
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit