The more we have the less we give !

I was curating today and thinking that I may curate the wrong thing and that may heard the community. That's why I always check posts from plagiarism using plagiarism checkers online. To be sure I don't use only one but a few of them, so I will never upvote the wrong content. So, only original content will be upvoted from me and that's the most important thing I think !

Since I'm growing in proof of brain and I'm using all my earnings to power up. I see how the value of my upvote is growing. So, if many curators like me will give the content the same amount, so the post could be hot and even trending after. So, curators like me are responsable about what they upvote. In the end we could be the reason of pushing non original content to trending without even checking that. Because it's impossible to check all the posts I think even if we have a special group working on that. Some posts will be missed anyway.

So, that's how I curate usually. When I see a well writen post with a lot of information, deep analysis and from an author I;m not sure about. I always use plagiarism checkers to be sure about that. But, even though, if it's original and I liked it, I have to think about how much I should give % using my upvote. If the content is really awesome and I like it, I can even give 100% if the idea and the message is valuable to the community. I may give 50% to a good well writen content but not that perfect for me. But, when I have time, I just spread my upvotes to good posts giving them all 10% if I'm sure they are original. That's the most important criteria for me.

So, in one of my previous posts I wrote that I have 3 types of content to upvote. 100%, 50% and 10%.

This time and since my upvote is growing and more noticed, I will have more types of curation to create. I will even include 5%. So, imagine that we may give about 6 of 100% upvotes a day. 12 of 50% upvotes a day. That means 24 upvotes of 25% a day. In this case we may give about 48 upvotes of 12,5 % a day. That's about 50 content to upvote with 10%. It's crazy. That's why we have to spread our upvote and give some 100%, others 50% and go on. To consume less and to save some time. Consuming 50 posts a day is really a lot. But we have to do our best to consume as much as possible. So, in case I will give 5% upvote, so I should consume 100 posts and that's really crazy during 12 hours. It's even impossible maybe. But, if we include in that comments as well, because it's also a content created, that will be much easier to do.

As you see curating is not that easy. Plus there are people who control the reward pool and they will not like it if someone gives 12 of 100% a day. It's like consuming 12 posts a day. But I don't think it's a crime if that's a good content and deserved to upvote. So, as investors we should always upvote someone to earn those curation rewards and missing this opportunity could be the real crime. lol I never like those who leave their voting power 100% without touching it. Because I think there are many authors who are in need. In case the curator can't use his power, he/she should or delegate it, or to create a group of people who could help in curating in case this curator is very busy. Esoecially this should be implimented to big accounts.

Since, I'm building my account. I'm sure that my upvote with the time will be noticed. Some will even ask me why I'm curating this way. I know that I may consider myself as a free investor who have the right to do what I want. But still I'm doing that in a community. So, the opinion of everyone caring about the community and the token should matter. In this case I may listen, discuss many options and then do it the way I see it right for myself and the community and the future of the coin or the token.

Imagine if you were a whale. Try to put yourself in their skin. It's impossible to satisfy everyone. In our curation system it seems that the more we have the less we should give. That's the only way to avoid any further conflicts with the community !

As you see, curating is also a hard work. Where curators have to take in consideration a lot of factors. That's why I think giving to curators 50% is the best option. Not more and not less. Because if the author is not satisfied from his/her earning, there is always an option to earn from curating because only creating here is not the case. This system is great. It pushes both authors and curators to build a healthy, active and valuable community !

Our curation system is really great. I'm enjoying it !