So, I have a house in my name and I have to sell it to support the community? that's what you want to say?
More that steemcurator is "paying" somebody for their content with the expectation that the money will be used a certain way. If they don't use it in the way that steemcurator expects, then they'll "pay" somebody else. Everybody's entitled to do what they wish with their STEEM.
This is left to the expertise of the curator to review the balance of the wallets
👆🏼 This. When I'm curating, I interpret the results in the chart.
I know what the comments are, but the amount that is reflected there, is the amount that is received by beneficiary rewards.
I'll double check my understanding of this... the field returned is "comment_benefactor_reward" so what you say makes sense.
'Paying' is not the correct term in Steemit, some users get confused and think that rewards are a payment, hence they see Steemit as a job, when it is not.
That steem garden account in the example you gave is wrong, but according to the existing rules it needs to have a recent power up to be inside the club, but for some reason you can see that it hasn't received more support. Maybe that's the reason, "for not having a recent power up, as the rule says".
Why do you divide in two the transfers? users and exchanges? All this should go together, since it is the same thing. Anyway, the only thing that matters is that the balance of the power up is always higher. Oh, by the way, at some point it can be used for any period? 2 months, 6 months, years.
I'm just telling you, that at least those words of (no power up) would not be the right one. Sounds like bullying to users hehehehe.
Oh and I understand how comment_benefactor appears. Exactly are the rewards of benefits, delegated to another account in the publications. I just wanted to see if it could be changed so that people don't get confused. Everything should look optimal for all steemit to use it soon.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit