As a detective, I have the responsibility and commitment to support the review of content to verify that the content protocol is complied with, that is, that users share original content and properly cite the information they take from the internet. Those abusers who seek to obtain rewards through plagiarized and repeated content generated by AI, among other abuses, will be detected, and duly identified and reported.

_Pixabay

Below I share the cases that were detected and validated as abuse, some related to the chain of farming accounts previously reported in the post Weekly Report 71 and Weekly Report 76.

No.	Post Link	Source	Abuser ID	Abuse Type
1	LINK	LINK	@hyug09	Reward Farming
2	LINK	LINK	@gftede	Reward Farming
3	LINK	LINK	@kuram1	Reward Farming
4	LINK	LINK	@keraa11	Reward Farming
5	LINK	LINK	@gatibam932	Reward Farming
6	LINK	LINK	@dapho1	Reward Farming
7	LINK	LINK	@njmk	Reward Farming
8	LINK	LINK	@zup1	Reward Farming
9	LINK	LINK	@ash129	Reward Farming
10	LINK	LINK	@kalpo	Reward Farming
11	LINK	LINK	@ghgu	Reward Farming
12	LINK	LINK	@tanjima	Plagiarism Content
13	LINK	LINK	@ikbal212	Reward Farming
14	LINK	LINK	@zacharyl	Reward Farming
15	LINK	LINK	@abrarmuda	Reward Farming

Each content goes through a variety of tools that serve to verify the authenticity of the content of each publication.

Search Tools.

Plagiarism Detectors	AI Content Detectors
quetext	openai
etxt.biz	zerogpt
plagiarismchecker	gptzero
plagiarismdetector	contentatscale
check-plagiarism	Paraphrasingtool
prepostseo	Crossplag
smallseotools

To conclude my report, it is necessary to point out that in each case identified, I leave in the comment a link to the @abuse-watcher publication where some information and advice on plagiarism and abuse is shared.

I appreciate the confidence of the Steem-watcher team, we are at your service.