Plagiarism, spam, and any other type of abuse can be detrimental to the development of the platform, so content review is necessary to detect abusers who seek rewards without showing respect for internal content policies.
The Steem watcher team makes efforts to assist in the task of reviewing content inside and outside any community, with the intention of validating that there are no abusers.
Below I share the cases that were detected and validated as abuse, some accounts have been reported repeatedly, we hope that they will soon begin to comply with the content policies.
No. | Post Link | Source | Abuser ID | Abuse Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Link | Link | @satren | Reward Farming |
2 | Link | Link | @tetsu26 | Plagiarism Content |
3 | Link | Link | @smartlouis | Plagiarism Content |
4 | Link | Link | @satren | Spamming Content |
5 | Link | Link | @victori03556709 | Plagiarism Content |
6 | Link | Link | @jenxi | Spamming Content |
7 | Link | Link | @ai16z | Reward Farming |
8 | Link | Link | @ichmusslaufen | Spamming Content |
9 | Link | Link | @slavdimich | Repeat Content |
10 | Link | Link | @satren | Spamming Content |
Each content goes through a variety of tools that serve to verify the authenticity of the content of each publication.
Search Tools.
Plagiarism Detectors | AI Content Detectors |
---|---|
quetext | openai |
etxt.biz | zerogpt |
plagiarismchecker | gptzero |
plagiarismdetector | contentatscale |
check-plagiarism | Paraphrasingtool |
prepostseo | Crossplag |
smallseotools |
To conclude my report, it is necessary to point out that in each case identified, I leave in the comment a link to the @abuse-watcher publication where some information and advice on plagiarism and abuse is shared.
I appreciate the confidence of the Steem-watcher team, we are at your service.