DEFCON 4

in hive-196917 •  3 months ago 

image.png

There are some in the U.S establishment that want credit for unleashing, not containing China. It is a mistake to act on thinking that the prosperity of others is your doing. It is imperative in today's world to make a distinction of cause and effect for there are those who readily accept the role of god amongst men. For the most part that is not the case in the U.S. The exception being some deranged crackers but they live in an echo chamber.

Stated above is the human fallacy America has to deal with. China’s quest to overtake the U.S however is causing all sorts of issues. For them to be a proper adversary they should take heed to the issues presented for those are the fault lines that could develop awry.

China is a country who counts on the overseas Chinese to put a good word for them. Paying homage to Beijing is is a form of soft power. In the Indo-Pacific this caused power dynamic issues in the past, maybe some went to expand a Chinese empire and receive investments, and maybe others flight was due to a regime they found rigid. Regardless, the U.S is there as a counter to China.

China is not the sole influence in the Indo-Pacific so they cannot maintain a cultural and economic hegemony and this irks them. What they consider their backyard is another's front yard. There isn't an ideological battle taking place, just common sense; Don’t tread on me. This is not containment. Centralization and the encroachment of ASEAN is what China desires to form a bloc to use against the U.S when it wishes.

There is currently a small fire burning in ASEAN country Myanmar. Ethnic chaos. What we do know is that the Junta is backed by China. What we do know is the Junta got their ass kicked by the border states. What we do know is China is doing everything to secure the border. We have to consider the most common denominator here.

With globalization there is a rise of legal issues. Whether it is borderless money, or freedom of navigation. International law is a gray area. It is structurally weak when intergovernmental organizations are obsolete and domains are limited by a state in a jurisdiction. The lack of uniformity creates loopholes against the universal declaration of human rights.

But globalization is what has made nations wealthy for eons. Protectionism and Nationalism is often used against bidirectional foreign influence. A lot of people would prefer it to be one way. By default the U.S is not one of them. There is a disagreement between technology technocrats and it is about the pace and standards. China is the main de-accelerationist. Russia has dealt with acceleration since the end of the cold war.

Some countries are afraid of reform. It would mean a power broker becomes disenfranchised. Oh the selfish dishonor, how inconvenient. Globalization is hard on some regimes. It makes them want to cutoff all contact. The domestic reality is globalization is how nations engage but a foreign voice can be a threat when the domestic voice is curbed or warped. Some countries don't want to hear an opinion. That is freedom talk.

image.png

Based on conditions I elevate the situation to DEFCON 4. Negroes should reconsider travel to Hong Kong. You are not Helen of Troy negro, ships won’t sail for you. I will be the only bidder, and I got a container full of coconuts.

I will recuse myself from following current events, I simply can’t keep up. My comments and opinion will only occur after the fact. My focus shall be on the distribution of indisputable blockchains worldwide for everyone.

The Korean community should not attend an end of the world themed party by the crackers nor Chinese. Definitely don’t drink the juice. The only thing the Negroes are going to kill is the club. See you there.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Escritura robada.