An unbeliever would overcome the irreligious. This is the truth of our word. Because an atheist is a believer. He is a person who believes that there is a being other than religion. His power bows before him. However, an unbeliever is a complete denier. He does not accept any power. He says that we came into existence as a result of coincidences. Irreligion and unbelief are two different things.
Here, perhaps, it is necessary to proceed through terms. We know theism as theism. Or atheism; is godlessness. An atheist does not believe in God, but may believe in the existence of another power. A deist believes neither in religion nor in prophets. He believes directly in God without accepting the intermediary. Pantheism, or all-theism, is an all-encompassing immanent theism, claiming that the universe and nature are the same as God.
From the explanations; The truth of the statement that the irreligious can only come from an unbeliever is understood. Because there is a degree of difference between those who do not believe in any power and those who do not believe in religion and accept that there is another power. In these circumstances, someone who is cruel, cruel and cruel can be dealt with by someone more harsh and equal. Religious terms are similes. It doesn't make it easy to understand.