Antonio Conte was criticized for applying defensive football in the match against Manchester City.
Antonio Conte
Antonio Conte was criticized. Due to implementing defensive football in the match against Manchester City, he is considered to have adopted an 'anti-football' strategy.
Well, the readers of the coils, we are returning to this endless debate, about how soccer should be played. Many people assume that soccer is required to entertain and, therefore, offensive play is a necessity.
But if that's the case, why is football familiar with catenaccio defensive strategies? If football is all about open offensive games, how can a squad lack sufficient ammunition for that to win?
That is, for many people too, football is not just played in one way. One who agrees with this is Antonio Conte.
When handling Juventus first, Conte did know only one style: offensive play and dominate the game. Immediately, came the assumption that Conte is a coach who saklek.
The view was changed when Conte became coach of the Italian National Team. With a squad that is not flashy, Conte must not be pragmatic. He must seek maximum results with the power of potluck.
Italian performance, especially in the 2016 European Cup, was praised. Conte is considered successful. From there finally found out, Conte is not a saklek coach. He implements offensive football at Juventus because the skuat is possible. If not? Yes, he will look for other ways.
Likewise at Chelsea. When the strategy was not successful initially, Conte finally switch to plan b: play with the formation of three defenders. We then know, the formation became the base of his success brought the Blues won the Premier League 2016/2017.
This season, Conte is again hit with a skuat problem. He repeatedly complains (in the presence of the media) that the officials have no ambition similar to him. Finally, he has to work with the squad provided for him - not with the squad he is craving for.
Inevitably, Conte returned to be pragmatic. Including when facing City in Etihad on Sunday (4/3/2018). Single Bernardo Silva in the 46th minute to make Chelsea defeated 0-1.Namun, not a defeat that makes Conte criticized.
If I remember correctly, two days ago, Arsenal twice played against them and you criticized (Arsene) Wenger for conceding three goals in 30 minutes.
- Antonio Conte
In the game, it is clear that Chelsea really intend to play defensive.Total, only 2 shots they release throughout the game-comparison with City who release 11. Conte was not evasive. When many who blaspheme defensive football, he actually offers another perspective.
"I think, we all have to be able to face the criticism. Stupid if I play open against Manchester City and lost 0-3 or 0-4," said Conte as reported by ESPNFC.
"If I remember correctly, two days ago, Arsenal twice played against them and you criticized (Arsene) Wenger for conceding three goals in 30 minutes."
The Chelsea defeat, in the end, led to another discussion. Ogden Ogden, in his column at ESPNFC, posed a question: is the only way to beat City out by attacking them? Yes, not really, anyway. If your team does not have the squad pretty slick and an adequate system (let alone a solid defense), believe me ... the result will be the same.
the cityzens
iris8703 Menit0 0
eman bnr "deh cave team .. the best team candidate in the future .. kaga wrong cave love ama city .. first cave nntn ball in cave life when city opponent stoke when cave is 4th grade sd ,, and city winning dramatic jg that moment ,, and the first time cave nntn city cave immediately become true fans of his city until now ,, and al results ,, we can see for yourself"Conte: Stupid If I Play Open Opponent City
kumparan.com 05 Mar.2018 11:35
Antonio Conte was criticized for applying defensive football in the match against Manchester City.
Antonio Conte
Antonio Conte was criticized. Due to implementing defensive football in the match against Manchester City, he is considered to have adopted an 'anti-football' strategy.
Well, the readers of the coils, we are returning to this endless debate, about how soccer should be played. Many people assume that soccer is required to entertain and, therefore, offensive play is a necessity.
But if that's the case, why is football familiar with catenaccio defensive strategies? If football is all about open offensive games, how can a squad lack sufficient ammunition for that to win?
That is, for many people too, football is not just played in one way. One who agrees with this is Antonio Conte.
When handling Juventus first, Conte did know only one style: offensive play and dominate the game. Immediately, came the assumption that Conte is a coach who saklek.
The view was changed when Conte became coach of the Italian National Team. With a squad that is not flashy, Conte must not be pragmatic. He must seek maximum results with the power of potluck.
Italian performance, especially in the 2016 European Cup, was praised. Conte is considered successful. From there finally found out, Conte is not a saklek coach. He implements offensive football at Juventus because the skuat is possible. If not? Yes, he will look for other ways.
Likewise at Chelsea. When the strategy was not successful initially, Conte finally switch to plan b: play with the formation of three defenders. We then know, the formation became the base of his success brought the Blues won the Premier League 2016/2017.
This season, Conte is again hit with a skuat problem. He repeatedly complains (in the presence of the media) that the officials have no ambition similar to him. Finally, he has to work with the squad provided for him - not with the squad he is craving for.
Inevitably, Conte returned to be pragmatic. Including when facing City in Etihad on Sunday (4/3/2018). Single Bernardo Silva in the 46th minute to make Chelsea defeated 0-1.Namun, not a defeat that makes Conte criticized.
If I remember correctly, two days ago, Arsenal twice played against them and you criticized (Arsene) Wenger for conceding three goals in 30 minutes.
- Antonio Conte
In the game, it is clear that Chelsea really intend to play defensive.Total, only 2 shots they release throughout the game-comparison with City who release 11. Conte was not evasive. When many who blaspheme defensive football, he actually offers another perspective.
"I think, we all have to be able to face the criticism. Stupid if I play open against Manchester City and lost 0-3 or 0-4," said Conte as reported by ESPNFC.
"If I remember correctly, two days ago, Arsenal twice played against them and you criticized (Arsene) Wenger for conceding three goals in 30 minutes."
The Chelsea defeat, in the end, led to another discussion. Ogden Ogden, in his column at ESPNFC, posed a question: is the only way to beat City out by attacking them? Yes, not really, anyway. If your team does not have the squad pretty slick and an adequate system (let alone a solid defense), believe me ... the result will be the
the cityzens
iris8703 Menit0 0
eman bnr "deh cave team .. the best team candidate in the future .. kaga wrong cave love ama city .. first cave nntn ball in cave life when city opponent stoke when cave is 4th grade sd ,, and city winning dramatic jg that moment ,, and the first time cave nntn city cave immediately become true fans of his city until now ,, and al results ,, we can see for yours
elf