Heellooo @majesticcrypto, and nice to Steem you! :-)

Thanks for reviewing this feedback-tracking project, of which I hadn't read or heard anything. One of the doubts its spirit raises in me is the following question: must content creation be driven (or even dictated) by the audience's wishes? Doesn't such a powerful blockchain-based tool deepen the current mental trend to reduce art and creation to the launch of a "product", and one that receives its worth (its very justification) from public appraise?

Apart from erasing an approach of the artistic processes as being self-legitimized and therefore not dependent on what the masses "think" (there are thousands of excellent movies or books that have been liked by a really tiny fraction of the public), this kind of "audience-pegged accountability" would apparently make the future contents rely on rewarded comments expressed by the ones who most time spend on WATCHA, not necessarily by the users who most know about the technical or cultural background that would give relevance to their comments. We've seen how Steemit itself has been (still is?) overwhelmed by nonsense and reward-centered messages ;-)