The huge problem seems to be your reading comprehension and perspective on things.

Did you read this sentence?

Cryptocurrency is still confusing making it difficult for the average person to understand.

Notice it says "person" and not woman/women. That means both genders.

This was followed up by:

Hence we see an over representation of males since the world of geeks are mostly filled with penises. Women simply did not make great strides into that arena.

Are you disputing the technical industry and all the complimentary facets such as programming is overwhelmingly male? If you are, you are completely mistaken.

The problem here is you take an article that did contain a bit of tongue in cheek but was nowhere stating that crypto is too advanced for women.

And how many times have I posted in articles that the biggest challenge for developers is easy of use? Maybe a dozen times.

You stated this:

We have women, many of them all over the crypto space.. no need to dumb it down for us.

Yes there are women all over the place, that is not disputed. But do you think it is anywhere near 50/50 since that is the percentage of the population? Do you think women are making near half the money or holding half the wealth?

I would say that is not even close to being true. Thus, women are completely under-represented on here as they are in the entire technical arena.

So stop taking this as an attack on women and getting defensive with the idea that I was making the point that it was too complicated for women.