SAFE? SCHOOLS : Unproven Educational Policy for Australian Children & Teenages (part 1)

MINDFUCKING OUR KIDS WITH NEW GENDER IDEOLOGIES

INTRODUCTION

I prepared my writing desk and took a deep breath to gain focus. I was trying a new approach with instigating my creative writing mindset and this approach involvedadding pen to paper to change my tactics. This change to process and tactics had a notable difference swiftly to how I thought and constructed my writing.

When writing the introductory notes on a piece of paper to brainstorm for this post, I hesititated. The motions of going through the languourous contemplative ebbs & flows were a very welcome experience.

Introspection: mental reconnaisance. Satisfaction of ink forming into shapes into letters into words into language from your sometimes abstract and illogical thoughts was most enjoyable!

I wrote a list, planning my writing output and lines of investigation to pursue. Some topics were culled, some remain and are further clarified with set parameters to achieve. The horizons near on each planned article/post instead of new ones consistently appearing on the list. As much as I enjoyed indulging abstract thought, logical thought and the process of writing is the end goal for ALL of my writing for now.

But I can't help toying with a little foul play against the ideologues and cultural Marxist pallbearers of the coffin which contained our once accepted traditional values. I just fear I might plunge into that same abyss of echoing hysteria and identity doomsday scenarios that my targets of scorn inflict upon me!

INTROSPECTION

I don't want to sound like a hysterical Helen Lovejoy copycat who with an almost gleeful shrill cry of moral panic indulges in hysteria.

I'm becoming aware that the planned course of my writing and investigation will make it increasingly seem so. Yet I have to trundle on; garish with emotion and criticism at times. It's just too bad for the subjects of my scorn I guess.

They may learn to consider what I'm positing (perhaps don the thinking cap I put on?) as not just another example of the ignorance that is their intersectional oppression. Or, God forbid: a mortal threat to their gender/sexual identity.

Is this virtuous? I ask myself when looking at the ten-thousandth example of a puerile & abject downward spiral in front of me.

Why is this considered virtuous? And why teach the upcoming generation of primary & secondary students this?

It's not so much virtue that I'm enacting in trying to bring attention to this exponential downward spiral. It's a core rejection with every fibre of my being and every spark of my thought against what I witness. At the very least, this core awareness held within me demands I share my anger: where's the counterargument or rational opposition these days to such issues? Certainly not in the mainstream media.

---

SAFE SCHOOLS COALITION AUSTRALIA

Image from Wikipedia

The intention with this introduction into the ideological battleground that our children in Australian schools are going to be subjected to is that I want to explore some questions that have been raised and look at the propaganda being utilized. Yep, primary and secondary school is now a battleground and I perish the thought of how many parents fully comprehend this.

I intend on revisiting this topic in follow up chapters so I can explore particular claims and concerns that are illustrated in this cartoon flyer which I discovered on the footpath in a quiet residential suburb a few weeks ago.

I will also look into the other end of the spectrum which is being promoted by our governments and their marxist lackeys. A short perusal of the official Safe Schools Coalition's webpage demonstrated that there will be a lot of material to investigate and try to understand.

WHAT IS SAFE SCHOOLS

SAFE Schools is the brainchild of a bunch of neo-marxist academic intelligentsia that crawled out from under the rock of heteronormative, patriachal and systematically racist ideological oppression(s). It was formed in 2010 by two radical ideologues in partnership (see above cartoon flyer), which both Victoria (state) & Australia (federal) funded.

The creators and participants of Safe Schools are very passionate as they are convinced of the utmost importance with tackling low percentile instances of oppression amongst apparently marginalised subsections of the population. They consider themselves as nobility and the stewards of future behaviorual indoctrination in relation to how these low percentiles can overcome oppression and be who they truly are, because they were 'born this way' and systematic oppression forces them to be conformative (heteronormative?).

It's such an advanced noble goal that they tend to engage in any opposition using an enormous appendix of marxist language to emphasise it's importance. Fuck that. Just sounds haughty and elitist to me.

Much like protozoan primordial slime, this dialectical opposition towards traditional behaviours and societal norms only came into prominence when the environmental conditions were just right for it's speedy evolution and successful reproduction.

The current biome of intellectual "fertility & freedom" gave an optimum petri dish for such postmodern viral spores to grow, bloom & reproduce. It is the age of academic pedagogy and viral blooms of potentially harmful thought-spores flourish in such conditions.

Much like a bacterial or viral pandemic, thought-spores spread quickly and with debilitating consequences to what was considered healthy before. By the time the populace is aware of a pandemic surfacing, it's usually too late to do anything about it. Be aware of viral risks in the polluted atmosphere of ailments and afflictions aplenty

SUDDENLY IT WAS THE ISSUE

I heard some stirrings in the #Australia media about wanting young school students to learn about same-sex attraction, sexual pleasure, different sexual practices and the wide wonderful world of gender diversity some years ago. It only reached this part of the country and became mainstream around 2014-2015.

It became a touchstone issue for elections. The usual sanctimonious pandering by politicians to an unenthused greater populace was now focused on the percentiles of non-heterosexual and non-heteronormative children that suffered due to not being heterosexual. The media also picked up this world of hurt on their shoulders and suddenly stood as the defender of LGBT non-adult rights.

It was a real shitfight and probably still is, although I do not hear much about it anymore in the media or government today.

I read a little bit into Safe Schools but couldn't make a proper assertation whether the ideas behind it were of merit or conversely harmful to children.

The aggressive campaigns waged by both sides, both in the left-learning LGBTIQAP + Greens/Labor sycophants and their opposing conservative, Christian, concerned parents was propaganda. Legacy media was spammed with flyers in letterboxes, ineffectual public protests in capital cities, manipulative radio ads, TV. Social media was ablaze in a righteous glory of standing up against oppression and people were vocal (hysterically so). Facebook profile picture borders were changed and memes generated.

I was repelled at this display of concerted media ideological bombardment.

I switched off at the time and just considered both sides unable to present a solid argument for or against. They were both right in some aspects but the propaganda format of delivery of ANY of their ideas dissolved any trust in the arguments posted.

COME HITHER, CHILD, AND BE EMBRACED BY WHAT WE SAY IS BEST FOR YOUR

Link	Link

It's now 2018 and we have drag queens dressed like satanic demons reading in libraries to pre-schoolers. We have children being taken away from parents when the parents don't consent to their child undergoing cosmetic surgery and hormonal poisoning (I will not call it Sexual Reassignment Surgery) because they feel like a girl after playing with a barbie doll. Such damaging & experimental social-sexual psychological pedagogy could be toxic to the development of a child. Has the question not be posited as to the rights of a child to discover their biological gender and how it is meant to function sexually ON THEIR OWN?

I'm not suggesting we remove sexual education from our schools entirely (although I question the intent behind it's inclusion in the Primary school cirriculum). There is a process called puberty which happens naturally to the overwhelming statistical majority of children and it's being toyed with via recent proposed educational policy changes and those insufficiently contested policy changes that have already been enacted.

What about of parents' rights to not accept Safe Schools polished and glossy presentation on the "facts?" If I was a parent, I would not consent to having such topics regarding sexuality introduced into my child's learning at an age where such topics just don't require this focus and educational indoctrination.

I'm not the only one who feels ill-at-ease with current trends. Here is @perceptualflaws and a couple of articles which also reference what I'm trying to elucidate with these articles. Society is going somewhere and via the hasty introduction of these new spores of thought, I don't know where society will end up.

• The War on Childhoold & Gender Identity

• The Road to Androgyny. The War on Sexual Perception

CONCLUSION

I'm very happy to be able to post my thoughts on here and to interact with others who are going to incredible lengths; both in their studious research and intellectual rigour. It's a feeling that rids me of the normal enervated state online media consumption causes.

Let's keep this ball rolling. Part 2: Who is Gary Dowsett, the 1980's marxists of academia, LGBTPism.

Will be coming in a week!