If you have to qualify 'violence,' you don't have a problem with violence.

in informationwar •  6 years ago 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-7-tennessee-victims-died-blunt-force-injuries-215349580.html

This story has seemed to get put on the back burner, or didn't seem to grab the attention of MSM viewers, onlive-slacktivists, and Twitterverse pundits as much as the less deadly North Carolina shootings.

Here's a screenshot of CNN's front page this morning. Yesterday, this also dominated coverage as the less convenient (but deadlier) killings in Tennessee were barely mention by CNN, MSNBC, Yahoo, Reuters, HuffPost, etc..:

https://imgur.com/3vlxPgB

The people who loudly yell about the shootings don't have a problem with violence. They only wish to push an agenda. They will continue to sensationalize, highlight, and give attention to specific killers as long as they can use it to their benefit. Never mind the next killer they are encouraging, influencing, and inspiring. Media contagion be damned.

But remember, we HAVE to do something about this dangerous epidemic of GUN VIOLENCE. /sarcasm

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @kangamangus! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!