SueTube
Susan Wojcicki has been the chief executive officer of YouTube since 2014. Her tenure as the company's boss has brought about a confusing and troublesome number of policy decisions.
Cui Bono?
These policies are designed to prop up far left voices. You will not find channels such as The Young Turks being affected by these decisions as they peddle a narrative that Wojcicki promotes. The so called "progressive" wing of the Democratic party is being given a pass while everyone else, including liberals who don't embrace postmodernism, gets the short end of the stick.
Mainstream sources have in recent months seen a great deal of favoritism paid to them by Alphabet Corp.'s subsidiary YouTube, despite being less popular (receiving less engagement on posts, lower like/dislike ratios, and significantly fewer overall views). This seems to indicate collusion between YouTube and garbage content creators like Buzzfeed, Vice, Vox and mainstream broadcast and cable media outlets.
Recourse
It seems that there is no real method to petition YouTube on the negative decisions they make. They operate in the shadows despite proclaiming a commitment to transparency. Multiple content creators regularly speak on YouTube's wall of silence regarding their grievances such as Sinatra_Says, Steven Crowder, and Tim Pool despite their large audiences.
What Can Be Done?
There are a few real things that content consumers can do to punish YouTube for their transgressions. Here are a few suggestions.
That said, fuck Susan Wokcicki. Thank you for reading.
with bitchute you are doing again the same mistake... there is only one way to defeat the childrapists/gmopusher/forcedvaccination/antico2/emfspreaders/anitfreespeech crowds, it's simply to use open source decentralized systems.
For example there is freenet, i2p, ipfs
https://ipfs.io/
https://freenetproject.org/
https://geti2p.net/en/
https://www.qbittorrent.org/
https://livepeer.org/
or simply upload on bittorrent, there are a lot of livestreaming software for it :).
so why wanting to get back again in a ghettos? do you understand that bitchute is under the juridisction of the crown of england? do you understand that thousands of girls have been raped in england? do you understand what evil you preach here?
any system relying on single access point will be raided by the force of the childrapists...
please help me understand your mindset...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I recommended BitChute for two primary reasons:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
it's under uk jurisdiction, what don't you get there ? assange? rapes by the thousands accross the uk? prince andrew? what else do you need?
and worst, you forget the history of youtube, they said the same things, and then the pepsi child rapist guy arrived and things changed...
so you fall in the same trap...
help in increase adoption of p2p based... nothing says to not post on centralized, just use centralized as back ups, not main...
help, participate, don't be a willing slave...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The fact that it is based in the United Kingdom is concerning given the UK's government seeming wanton zeal for censoring people (I'd include the despicable treatment visited upon Tommy Robinson among some of the other issues you've already identified).
BitChute is actually a peer-to-peer platform, it is based on WebTorrent.
I do support projects that are less centralized that BitChute, such as DTube, but I don't know of another platform that has enjoyed adoption by creators more than BitChute, which, while unfortunate, is key to functioning as a proper surrogate to YouTube.
Ultimately, with the censorship issue, it seems unlikely a truly decentralized platform is possible with today's internet infrastructure. Someone has to register a domain and host the website's code, which is always going to introduce a degree of centralization even in blockchain based projects.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
how many point of access does bitchute has? single point of access = single point of failure...
Tommy... assange, prince andrew, jimmy saville... the true uk revealed, it's not for no reason that france waged war against this perfid entity...
you don't understand bittorrent or i2p or freenet... it's uncensorable... end. you just upload a file in your node, publish it, other node seed it, and it's gone... unstoppable... modern noding don't know what they store, everything is encrypted... it's just a big fish game, and the infrastructure is perfect for it, the problem is that stupid people posing low quality videos are surprised that their contents doesn't get shared :)...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @massspectrician! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit