this is basically common sense unless you are talking to politicians
enjoy the read
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Too bad the "common sense" is in total opposition to, you know, scientifically proven facts.
The more guns, the more possibilites to kill someone with a gun. Should be common sense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
im wondering where you get your facts
in virginia and new hamshire everyone has guns and there isno mass shootings there compared to california illinois where there is heavy restrictions from the govt
i think you are getting your scientific facts from MSM and corrupt lying govt officials sir
have a great day and good luck with that view
if someone obtained his license legally and shot people up gun control did not work
if someone obtained their gun illigally and shot a place up again gun control did not work
so i think the commonsense show has way more common sense than you sir
since where they ban the right to carry way more people are getting shot than where people have the right to carry
no wonder amerika is falling with logic like yours
we all have the right to believe what we want and good luck to you on those deceiving views you hold
cheers
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
From a multitude of scientific studies, as usual.
Not that ther ereally is a need for this because the statistics are openly available, but the studie generally compare to other countries, so it's a lot easier.
Just google!
Then you can find e.g. the following:
Suicide is not the same as murder, but it follows the same rules: The less available, the less death (and since every other type of suicide is harder, there are less suicides).
Or how aobut that?
Only cars kill more, and here we are talking about car country #1 in the world!
You have ifs there. We from IT call that a condition. So let's use common sense for a condition.
If (many) people cannot get a license legally, most of them won't get guns and wont shot people.
(Also there are less guns available illegally.)
If you cannot get your gun illegally, you cannot kill people with the nonexistant gun.
And no, "just get it illegally" is NOT easy if you are in a country with even moderately strict gun laws.
For example the last terrorist attack here in Germany (just 100km away from me) was done by a right wing nut attacking a synagoge.
He could not get his hand on "real" guns, so he used printed and self made ones.
Those failed after a few shots and he "only" could kill 2 people.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the swiss everybody has guns and there is hardly any crime there so ki dont really know what your talking about
in serbia and croatia everyone had guns and before NATO and the banksters involved themselves there it was hardly any crime there also
in saying that i agree the world would be a lot more better place without guns but nobody should ever get rid of them until politicians and cops get rid of theirs first and that is just for starters my friend
and they dont keep stats on the stories that guns saved peoples lives
lots of your stats are skewed but that is their grand design
there is thousands that are alive today because they had a firearm or someone protected them with one
mostly women getting raped and people robbing banks that citizens had firearms and saved the dirty banks from being robbed
have a great day bud but the only way i would agree to disarm if it started with the politicians and cops first otherwise we will be defenseless.
cheers
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, but the vast majority of those guns is because men are required to keep their gun at home after their army training.
Safely locked and because there are less gun nuts, seldom taken out there.
Yeah, that strange, silly argument.
First of all politicians very seldom go into your home and point a gun at you, do they?
Second, the police is not the thing you should worry about. You can quite easily beat the police when "we the people".
What you should be worried about is the military. That are the guys who came with tank after you if you have a gun.
Or drop a bomb on you if you happened to hide a anti tank gun.
If the state wants to really get you, no gun will save you. Ergo that argument is invalid for the point of keeping guns.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit