Most totalitarian states direct pseudoscience to publish results that support political needs. This pseudoscience, usually violates the scientific method, and has no basis in real Science!
Chairman Mao used the term Politically Correct to counter his Scientists who would tell him it was scientifically correct. They knew that PC, meant toe the party line...OR ELSE! It was not a new term, but this is where the modern use originated:
http://triggeralert.blogspot.com/2011/08/origins.html
What Political Correctness really means - wherever & in whatever form it appears - is this: that The State or similar authority (the Church, society, any dominant ideology, it doesn't matter which) has decided what you can or cannot think or say. It has decided this for you. Its definition is the one you must accept. Your opinion is wrong. Your opinion should not be heard. Your opinion is Incorrect.
So it is an attempt to stop opposing debate; to press a political program. The only reason to block scientific debate; is to protect fragile pseudoscience from analysis By Real scientists. This is only done to protect political programs used for control of the general population.
Image from article:
According to an FAQ put out by Ocasio-Cortez’s office, this new deal is “a 10-year plan to mobilize every aspect of American society at a scale not seen since World War 2 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.”
This fool wants to destroy our entire national economy, based on pseudoscience to limit carbon dioxide reduction to limit global warming. What she proposes would bankrupt this Republic long before we could finish the changes she demands.
Also it is important to understand that carbon dioxide (AKA greenhouse gas emissions has two scientific problems.
*First, it is NOT a control variable, which mean that global temperature can Not be varied or controlled using carbon dioxide (since it is not a control variable in the data set on temperature)
*Second if we took all the carbon dioxide present on the planet, and released it into the atmosphere, which is impossible, we would still not have enough to approach what they claim as a reasonable value. So their reasonable values are higher than we can reach using the entire World quantity of available carbon Dioxide. NOT a reasonable position!
So we are to Kill ourselves with taxes, and our economy with spending, to limit carbon dioxide; even though science shows it will do NOTHING to change global temperatures! I am tired of brainless Idiots making decisions that could destroy our combined future!
ha! sir smithlabs! great post and article. well, I don't have time to read and article, your post is supposed to tell me what's in the article but I know that would take effort so I won't expect that. But your title has a comma and a semi-colon and neither one is needed in that title. that's all. carry on as best you can with what little you have to work with.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
With that DAMN Cheetah Bot, I can not quote the article sections safely! That malignant software forces the posting account to do less extracts, to avoid being pooped upon!
Besides reading is good for you, LOL! YOU CAN READ, right?
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why don't you talk to them about your point there? They would probably mark your blog as one to be freed of their restrictions. I think they can be reasoned with and get an exemption from .
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Chinese are not inclined to grant exceptions, they are despots. I am fine with steem developing that app, I just do not see how they can add a censored routine within the blockchain, without tainting the blockchain.
I guess they could make another variant of the nsfw type listing, and make the app only open that single folder. They just did so badly on the hardfork, I hate to get them started on censoring things.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
sir smithlabs! I have no idea about the techical side. All I know is so far they have lasted through and adapted the restrictions but I'm sure there's more information on the wherein blog but that would require you to actually do some research instead of playing around so I understand if you aren't up to it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not too exciting; may have to go to weku, ROFLOL! I will look at it when they launch I guess.
I would not want to use up my tiny brain, on unneeded things, LOL....
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
well that's true, you have to conserve what little brain power you have!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True, steemit might be a waste of brain power, but it pays to be hard headed. Even with a tiny brain, LOL!
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!
FreezePeach
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@openparadigm Thanks for the curation! I do try to post good content here.
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @smithlabs! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click here to view your Board
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, these are very high numbers! I like you keeping track.
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
100% in agreement with you. Your point that carbon dioxide is not a control variable can't be over looked. In the post House Resolution 109 and Climate Change you can find some real data that makes your point. The levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lags temperature increases by 800 years historically and has nothing to do with driving the climate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, I will look at this link! Carbon Dioxide increases, are controlled by an increase in plant growth, which consumes the increase anyway....
I have looked at the raw data, and their computer model. I would have flunked thermodynamics if I had turned in such garbage for lab work!
They do not normalize their data by removing solar variations in output in a thermal calculations! This means their data is meaningless!
Then they omit the oceans from their computer Model; because they are too "complicated" to model! So they remove the best heat sink know to Mankind; that cover 2/3 rd of the planet, from their thermal calculations!
Science does not support man made global warming! This bastardization of pseudoscience is offensive to all real scientists!
I CALL BS on this garbage!
:)>
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit