"...she decided to have unprotected sex..."

In cases of child abuse and other rape, she didn't have that choice. Even so, once a human being is present in the womb, whether that person's mother was raped doesn't make it permissible to murder that person. Prior to a person being present in the womb, there is no just reason to restrict their parents from deciding whether it should come into being. After the person is present, no one, neither mother, father, nor anyone else, should have any right to kill them, for any reason.

People have rights. Should a man have unprotected sex, unvasectomized, with a women they know to be fertile, IMHO they have foregone any right to demand abortion. Should a woman voluntarily do the same, I reckon that's the case - but only once it is possible that a human person is present in their womb. Prior to an actual person being present, it's her body, and therefore her choice what may grow into a person within it.

Thanks!