If you've read my post about the Perpetual War, or if you are even remotely interested in the politics and economics that shape the modern-day human condition, you're aware of the fact that war is a feature, and not a bug, of the capitalism paradigm.
Image by mohamed hassan - source: PxHere
A general whose name I can't recall, once said that war is the continuation, on another level and with different means, of politics. And since there is no real divide between the economy and government, one might say that in in our time that means continuation of the politics of preservation and growth of capital; economy is war by other means, war is politics by other means. The drive to war is not accidental, nor is it, as many would have you believe, the natural state of human existence or cultural evolution, but instead it is inherent in the logic of capitalism. We have largely dismissed this notion because how could our water be polluted in this way? Nah, that's ridiculous... We sought to put an end to war by trying to convince the ruling classes to behave differently, more peacefully, and to this end we've managed to sign a slew of international agreements in which our leaders all swear to do everything possible to avoid large scale armed conflicts. After all, how could war, with its large scale destruction of property and life, be in the interest of the free market economy?
Marx saw capitalism for what is was and is, and he once wrote: "The leading ideas of any age, are the ideas in the leaders of that age." He alse knew that those leaders were, and still are, the capitalists, the owner class that has control over the four main factors of the capitalist mode of production: entrepreneurship, capital goods, natural resources, and labor. "Entrepreneurship" is a more romantic way of expressing capitalism's central characteristic of capital accumulation; successful capitalists start as entrepreneurs, but with the ultimate goal of accumulating more capital, a profit, growth. Bezos and Gates are entrepreneurs no more, and many in their class never even started as one. At its heart, capitalism incentivizes competition and self-interest. We so often have heard a version of the story of the noble entrepreneurial baker, who bakes and sells bread to accumulate enough capital to increase the living standard and happiness of himself and his loved ones, but provides a great service to the larger community by providing that bread. In this ideology, selfishness, being greedy even, is seen as a good thing, a positive trait. We believe this to be true, as expressed throughout popular culture; the "greed is good" speech in Oliver Stone's "Wall Street", the hilarious "show me the money" scene in "Jerry Maguire", and even the Whitney Houston song "The Greatest Love Of All" that says that love for one's self is the greatest love of all, are but a few cultural symptoms to attest to that fact. The leading idea of our age that the individual, individual rights, individual property and individual freedom trumps anything that's common or shared, is the idea that's in heads of the leaders of our age.
Jerry Maguire Show Me The Money!
"The sheer scale of production in the industrialising nations could no longer be contained within the geographical boundaries of the state and had to reach out beyond those limits. The interests of these large firms are increasingly merged with the state — and it backs them up politically and militarily in the name of the national interest. It builds up armies and weapons, invades countries where necessary to grab resources or to safeguard trade routes and markets, establishes spheres of influence and alliances — and it will go to war against other powers to defend any of these things."
source: Socialist Review
Capitalism is war, on all scales, and the competition at its heart inevitably leads to the elimination of the losers in that game, and the losers' capital to be added to that of the winners. Competition and elimination in an everlasting quest for growth; that's basically what capitalism is. The noble baker isn't so noble anymore when another baker encroaches on his segment of the marketplace; from that moment on, it's a fight to the end. Competition on small scales leads to trade wars, and eventually real wars on larger scales. When the bakery, through the "natural" process of elimination and incorporation, has grown to become "International Foods Incorporated", the intimate marriage between politics and the economy is expressed more openly, to the point that it's now obvious to anyone that government rules at the behest of the nation's largest industries and financial institutes. Some tend to forget that the bakery, when it just became the largest bakery in town, years ago, it already had great sway over the town's local government; politics is just the face put on the power relationship, the power imbalance between the capitalist class and the rest of us. It's only to be expected that we see international diplomacy and international treaties as the alternative to armed conflict, and diplomacy is certainly to be preferred over war. And it is true, as I've said myself so many times, that people never get into war over silly ideas like religion or socioeconomic ideologies, but that war is always our leaders fighting each other over something they think should be theirs; land, resources, cheap labor or to safeguard trade-routes. But in the end it's just capitalist competition and growth that on large scales translate into imperialist wars of expansion. Not in the last place the expansion of the idea that capitalism is good, the idea that's in our warring leaders' heads...
To close, here's an optimistic message, despite the title, about how we could evolve toward a post-capitalist society, a "system that will emerge if we suppress monopolies, and let prices of information and things fall, and if we radically de-link work from wages, and if we then nurture that part of the economy where free, shared and socially produced things are replacing money and market forces."
Capitalism is failing, and it's time to panic – Paul Mason
Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!
Recent articles you might be interested in:
Latest article >>>>>>>>>>> | COOL USA |
---|---|
Perpetual War | War On Film |
When Democracy Dies... | Redistributing Wealth |
The Futurists | The Twenty-second Amendment |
Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!
Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:
Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO
@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!
Could we start at "surpressing" the monopoly of all monopolies, the monopoly on violence?
Are you willing to give up the violence you use, to make your neighbours obey your will?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Without a government, how do you propose protecting yourself from your violent neighbors?
Are you nostalgic for the wild west?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The government IS my violent neighbors. If I don't let myself being extorted or oppressed by those neighbors what do you think will happen? They will send neighbors with guns to make me bow and obey them, that's what I call Wild West.
What do you think my neighbors will say if I defend myself against a thief or attacker from the street?
What do you think my neighbors will say if I defend myself against a thief or attacker from government?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So, you ARE nostalgic for the wild west.
You'd rather fend for yourself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One could organize defense. (organizing defense is not what government is)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Please explain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you organize for defense, you don't have rights that other people don't have. You don't have the right to rob people and put them in a cage if they don't want you to "defend" them. Governments are seen (by people believing in the most dangerous superstition as having the right to do what the mafia protection agency does. If a protection agency or you protecting yourself andyou family or neighborhood would do the things government does it or you would be (correctly) seen as a crook and a criminal
edit I saw just jet that in another post we already talked about this ;) I had forgotten that post. Peace.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you don't have rights that other people don't have, is that the same as saying you DO you have rights that other people DO have?
If you believe that individuals and or families should not be coerced (for-the-greater-good), what mechanism do you believe should protect individuals and or families from "mafia protection agencies"?
It seems that some referee or ombudsman is required, otherwise, any group of individuals and or families can quite easily overpower any non-affiliated individual and or family with impunity.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
More like, anti-competitive, monopoly-seeking (rent-seeking).
Mobster-Ethics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
First the general you are referring to is Clausewitz. Not sure if they were a general but they none the less coined the phrase. And second I downvoted because I don't like the insinuation of your post. Your ability to speak and write is a direct result of capitalism. And once you've gotten your spoils you attack it with gusto in order to keep your place in it. In the guise of being the speaker against it.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm pretty sure the Russians and the Chinese can "speak and write" as well...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hahahahahahaha
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
First, it's been a while since I read something this laughable... And second, I upvoted because this put a smile on my face 😉
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @zyx066! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @zyx066!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.896 which ranks you at #4553 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 98 contributions, your post is ranked at #48.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit