well any that protect privacy and weapon rights at the very least. So we can fix all rights by removing capitalism later....
RE: Net Neutrality
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Net Neutrality
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Won't the fall of capitalism be brought on by its failure to meet the needs of the people to such an extent that the masses revolt.
What about:
Bring the failure
Let it suck so much everybody gets fed up
We all go hungry for a few days
We all fight back together
Keeping net neutrality is a placating band-aid. Pull it off, let the infection come and take the leg.
Passing laws and enforcing laws is just more control in the long term.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
but there is a problem with that. I understand accelerationism, but its not always the right thing to do. If people do not understand what the problem really is, and the lack of freedom stops them from finding out. They might not change anything.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
that is a good point, and I do agree net neutrality is important for freedom. My trip is that laws seem necessary. They build on each other. Freedom of speech is useless without protection from murder, Enron and ecoli. The government does an OK to shitty job at this but who else would pay a utility regulator such as the one who are supposed to monitor internet speeds.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you are assuming that a market system would still exist without a government. Capitalism literally can not exist without the government protecting it. So nobody would need to pay a utility regulator, because they wouldn't need to exist.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am not assuming that at all. We are somewhat in agreement. I don't think the internet could exist without capitalism. If capitalism could not exist without government then the internet could not exist (with any reasonable quality)without government. It would be like setting up the internet at a Rainbow Gathering. Without the internet people would organize like ants to put something together and regulate it and all of the other nouns that people want.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
originally it was created by the gov for the military. Capitalism is only the main reason the military existed.
Stuff like economic calculation works extreme well. I forgot the country, but it went down to 10-15% of its trucks and was still able to supply the majority of the country with the resources it needed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So are you are down for a 15% loss in internet speed? What if the internet did not exist because we got rid of the gov/capital/military back in the 20's. What if we get rid of them now and we never get the thing that replaces the internet.
The internet started as a killing machine like all other military crap and now its used to subvert the same government that paid for it! What if the next thing is even better at toppling regimes then this 2.0 shit we have now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
actually it would be 10-20x faster
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit