I was shocked yesterday to run into this small group of people protesting Internet censorship three days before the European Parliament is due to once again vote on the infamous copyright directive. I was shocked because I had not heard anything about such protest taking place. Given the importance of the issue it should have been heavily shared on social media, if not announced on the mainstream media. But it wasn’t. Freedom of information, who gives a damn about that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc193/fc193812d26d6351b54c6b98d45b5b21f9f1ed82" alt="IMAG4064.jpg"
Even if I’m barely present on Facebook somehow I end up being informed of all sorts of protests and civic actions. Maybe I’ve missed it, so I decided to check the accounts of well-known local social influencers, those who spend most of their time talking about justice and freedom… and, nothing! Not a word about any protest taking part in Bucharest. Quite shameful considering the fact that Germany saw massive rallies on Saturday, as did Austria, Poland and Switzerland. (I wonder how they managed to get thousands of people to take to the streets in defense of Internet freedom.)
Clearly, not on the scale one would expect seeing that all Europeans will be affected. You would expect the whole continent to be in uproar. But most people don’t know and don’t care what might happen if the proposed law passes in its present form. Worse than that most would not even notice something has changed. Well, they might notice there’s less memes in their feed, but they’ll be easily distracted by pictures of their friends’ cut cats.
If the law were to pass on Tuesday and platforms like Google or Facebook would be forced to reach agreements on the proposed link tax, they would probably do so with the big mainstream media players. I’m sure they would find a away for people to share wholesome CNN news stories. The problem is with small content creators and independent news sites. Why would FB offer to pay some nobody for their content to be shared when they can easily censor it. The filters EU regulators have in their devious minds would prevent the regular user from uploading a snippet from @nobody at whothefuckcares.com. Would you feel inclined to share this very post on FB, chances are you wouldn’t be able to upload it because there’s no way Zuckerberg would agree to pay even one cent towards Steemit.com, much less to an obscure user of said platform.
The billions of users of FB, Google or YouTube will be left watching and consuming only pre-approved content from media giants, holders of the one and only truth. No one in their right minds would trust entities like Google or Facebook and having them pay some money to whomever would be actually fun, but this is less about them and their profits and all about the ability to share whatever you consider worth sharing.
With less and less independent opinions being shared online, the easier it would be to impose the one and only truth the powers-that-be want us to believe in. If it’s not on Facebook it doesn’t exist, like the protest I ran into yesterday because I happened to be in the area. The millions of other Romanian Facebook users have probably no idea there was a protest, like they have no idea there’s any reason to protest. In their sanitized version of reality, everything is and will be fine.
As for the Tuesday vote, much of our hopes are pinned on conservative forces in Hungary, Italy or Poland. One very interesting observation from Polish diplomats, the proposed filters and taxes would favor international media giants at the expense of local news platforms. In other words, the average European user would be able to read what, say, people in Washington would like them to read, but have no access to what others in their own country think.
“It is because Poland’s government does not accept any solutions that aim to restrict the freedom of speech on the Internet”, the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage (MKiDN), which is in charge of copyright laws in Poland, had said in a statement.
Warsaw also opposes what it considers too excessive a restriction on sharing content. According to Polish diplomats, such a remedy benefits international publishing companies and may endanger the well-being of many small and medium publishers, including the Polish ones..
Where heading to a world where the information reaching the public is filtered at the top ranks of the government. History has shown us that, once this kind of censorship arises, Fascism is only a few steps away...
I fear he are going to repeat all the stuff we did wrong in the XX Century. I mean, some of it never did disappeared.
We all learned in school how bad the German Nazis were... only to allow the Israelis to do exactly the same or worse to the Palestinians. And if you complain about it, the state sponsored propagandists will lash out against you, as if you are doing anything wrong by opposing genocide and tyranny!
Thanks for your article.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm afraid so, too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Seems every major event has been used to promote this bill passing in one way or another. Even the Child abuse inquiry here in the UK has pressed the narrative that it is the "free and uncensored internet" that is to blame and the NZ mosque killing are all about how it was allowed to "go viral" (A terminology that is steeped in irony when considering how they want us to view free speech - a virus- )
Locally we have the Brexit debate and the pro-brexit protests are highlighted with as little enthusiasm and impartiality as the protest you stumbled across.
Looks like this bill will be another nail in our coffin and soon we'll all have Kim Jong Un hairstyles to get used to...
Great post again @ladyrebecca, thanks for sharing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, everything they can say will protect anybody at all is being used to restrict freedoms. I've noticed too the issue of protecting children against pedophiles or self-harm images is high on the agenda. As is censoring antivaccination posts in the name of the greater good. In this case, it is artists's rights and earnings the law is supposed to protect...
Thanks for the resteem!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Be nice if their intentions were honourable but anything to do with "The Gov" has too many conflicts of interest, imo.
Happily resteemed, my pleasure :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The level of self interest I see in many is magnified by the amount of ignorance and apathy towards what is going on around them. People are so focused on either toiling away to get by to rushing for their immediate rewards they simply have no desire to look around them.
As big as some seem to be on vaccinations, I wish there was one that would cure the narcissism and apathy. They are allowing the powers that be shrink the corner they push us into. I have to hand it to the farmers of people. They have studied us as a herd and seem to understand exactly how to direct the masses while waiting to extract the stragglers (critical thinkers) who don't wish to walk with the herd.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You don't need to tell me... How do you think I got to have so little RL friends? Just because I cannot stand so much stupidity... people that have no unorthodox idea in their brain. The pride they take in conforming to the norm...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am an Amerikkkan refugee. Everybody hates me. No one likes me. I believe in the TRUTH!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.
@c-squared runs a community witness. Please consider using one of your witness votes on us here
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We're well crossed that line now
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't know, I think there's some hope left, not much, but still.... We still have this platform...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You got a 7.20% upvote from @ocdb courtesy of @ladyrebecca! :)
@ocdb is a non-profit bidbot for whitelisted Steemians, current max bid is 60 SBD and the equivalent amount in STEEM.
Check our website https://thegoodwhales.io/ for the whitelist, queue and delegation info. Join our Discord channel for more information.
If you like what @ocd does, consider voting for ocd-witness through SteemConnect or on the Steemit Witnesses page. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit