That maybe but its hard to trust people over the internet when no details are given by them about themselves. If you guys are using your own money, then soliciting investors online is not really required. You could probably try using this strategy with your money , show returns for the next few months. Then map all the transactions that have been using for this fund as a 'history' of your fund and to try and build some legitimacy. Thats the only way I can see you guys gaining any sort of trust right now if your are not willing to give more information about yourselves. Though 25% performance fee is a bit ridiculous even in crypto land. If your fund is going to make as much as you say it is then you do not need to charge that much
RE: Finally Here: Arbok
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Finally Here: Arbok
That is a legitimate concern, I don't yet project or promise any specific returns because testing of this strategy is still ongoing, and I will post on the results of it every weekend. Success should not be presumed until it actually eventuates. Hopefully, when you see the results of it over time, especially once there is enough capital for the affiliate bonus scheme, the fees will seem low compared to returns.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah maybe just use your own money for now, its the only way I see you guys managing a fund. Then use this page to document what you guys are doing, it will be a slow grind before people trust you with their money, but this is what it takes. If you guys are genuine about this then this is what would be the best way to build trust.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit