Have you seen a small fish abusing upvotes?
Tell me their name so I can make it right, sadly I can't go after dolphins or whales, yet
RE: A Brief Explanation About What This Account Is For
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A Brief Explanation About What This Account Is For
Yes @rppa is self voting 4 times per day and raping the reward pool. :P
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@justtryme90
Not if I flag 8 times in the same day.
Basically I put twice as much Steem back in the reward pool, compared to what I take from it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are making a bot set out to flag people for self voting, and then going around and self voting (aka "raping the reward pool"). That's hypocrisy at it's finest IMO. Not saying I am also not a hypocrite in this regard sometimes as well, but lets call a spade a spade.
All you are doing is re-directing "reward pool rape" into your own wallet.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I preffer to write this like this:
All you are doing is re-directing "reward pool rape" into your own wallet.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It does look better in bigger font. Indeed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And how do you expect the account to get stronger and be able to bring more SP back to the pool?
It's not like I have 50K in whale delegations that will allow me to focus on flagging exclusively
As long as the ratio is 2\1 in favor of flags, I'm having a positive impact on the community, when that changes, then you can acuse me of rape
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The generally approved way to grow an account is by adding value to the community, through posts, comments, and other stuff. Self voting your articles is one thing, but upvoting comments strictly for the sake of generating rewards for your account is typically frowned upon.
Then again, it's anarchy here, and all up to other stakeholders to determine if they feel your behaviour is excessive or not.
I would agree that a habit of downvoting excessive self voters and then rewarding yourself 4 100% votes a day seems discongruent to me
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't. I don't think what you are doing is a good idea. All it is, is continuing to 'rape the reward pool.'
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then I guess you don't know how math works.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And if you think my method is so bad, why not consult the top stakeholders on Steem, to see what they think?
Maybe you're a bit uptight about ethics, that you can't see the big picture? Ever thought about that?
Sadly almost nothing is done to combat abusers, and I have no intention to spend an hour a day, just to bring back 4$ of Steem to the reward pool.
For it to be worth my time, I need to bring hundreds of dollars back the community, because that will actually make a difference, unlike the pocket money I can return with my current SP
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nobody will disagree with me, because your idea is awful.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just half of it ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@justtryme90 has a point, if you are self voting to fund your operation against self voting it's hypocritical.
If you want to do something ethically you'll need to be completely above board in your action. Just do the flags.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't care about ethics, I care about results.
If I can bring more $$ back to the reward pool that way, then that's what I should do.
If ethics limit our effiency, then what's the point in having 'em?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Are serious? An opposition to self voting can only be on ethical grounds. You're trying to have your cake and eat it.
In any case you are factually wrong. You won't bring more $$ to the reward pool the way you are proposing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit