The pro-Palestine side has really fallen off a cliff with the "can't confirm the beheaded babies" thing, as if this is a massive win for them in proving that the media are promoting Israel.
First of all, it's not like CNN has been a mouthpiece for Israel.
Second of all, the pro-Palestine people are taking the "can't confirm" line to immediately mean that the claims were false.
That's not what it means, morons.
Still, even state-run Muslim news agencies are only reporting that the beheadings aren't confirmed.
Nobody is claiming that the Kibbutz massacre didn't happen, and that women and children -- including babies -- weren't killed.
I don't think that even Hamas is denying that.
So, really people? Really? This is how you handle your ethics in regard to murdering babies?
What if one of the babies found with his or her head detached didn't have the head cut off by a blade; but, the infant was strangled to death and the head fell off during the burning because of the broken neck muscles?
Is that better?
What if all the babies were used as target practice like the Nazis used to do?
Would that be better?
What if they just stomped the babies to death?
Would that be better?
When massacres happen, details are always fuzzy. It doesn't make it propaganda when somebody gets something wrong.
And, again, we haven't confirmed that the reporting is wrong.