Now that Julian Assange has been apprehended and charged, we finally get to the see the sealed secret charges that were brought against. A federal judge unsealed the charges and affidavit on Monday, showing us the criminal complaint which was used as the basis for his extradition request to the US. The the document here, filed on December 2, 2017.
Source
Among the information are chat logs between Assange and Chelsea Manning (then Bradley Manning). This is the root of the claims for a "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion".
The US charges Assange with encouraging Manning to access the Defense Department network by cracking a password. The chat logs they have support his communication with Manning, attempting to offer help to crack the password. But even they admit they don't know if a password was actually cracked:
"...it remains unknown whether Manning and Assange were successful in cracking the password."
"Investigators have not recovered a response by Manning to Assange's question, and there is no other evidence as to what Assange did, if anything, with respect to the password"
According to the inept FBI who brought the multi-million dollar Russia-gate joke, Assange is not acting as a journalist to get leaked documents for exposure, like WSJ or NYT would do. No, instead, they paint a picture of a spy who conspired to commit espionage. But alas, this was the whole claim during Russia-gate to tie Assange to Russia and Trump. But it's all bullshit.
Manning apparently didn't know it was Assange she was communicating with, according to the logs" "it took me four months to confirm that the person i was communicating was in fact assange."
But as a result of the leaks information, WikiLeaks became famous in 2010, while Manning would also be famous as the leaker. But Manning was sentenced to 35 years for copying and sharing the files until a pardon from Obama in 2017. The most known is the Collateral Murder video where civilians were bombarded and murdered by US military forces from an aerial attack.
The reason for the extradition having validity is a "probable cause" that Assange and Manning reached an illegal agreement, thought he logs didn't show any direct proof of such. I guess they want to go fishing for evidence by interrogating Assange and getting him to confess to something he probably didn't do.
In greater efforts to make Assange responsible for causing "injury to the United States" by releasing the info, is the insinuation that Assange and WikiLeaks were working with terrorists, specifically the Taliban and al-Qaeda. Why else would someone dare to expose wrongdoings by the US military? They have to be terrorists! Great logic... How dare anyone know or share the truth with the public...
Apparently, the Taliban had the leaks from Assange, and told the NYT: "We are studying the report… If they are US spies, then we will know how to punish them."
The Washington Examiner explains:
The affidavit also alleged the Taliban exploited the WikiLeaks disclosures to put U.S. allies in danger, citing a New York Times article headlined, “Taliban Study WikiLeaks to Hunt Informants.” It also said the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, showed that the terrorist was actively seeking information contained in the WikiLeaks disclosures and that al Qaeda was providing him with information from the leaked Afghanistan war reports. The Afghanistan war reports also contained specifics on improvised explosive device techniques and countermeasures espoused by the U.S. that “the enemy could use these reports to plan future lED attacks,” the affidavit said.
Well, case closed. Obviously Assange is guilty of aiding the enemy now, right? If the terrorists end up with your published material exposing US military activity, then you're aiding terrorists. Of course.
References:
- Unsealed Affidavit Tries To Put WikiLeaks In Cahoots With The Taliban, Bin Laden
- Julian Assange affidavit unsealed
Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
me for more content to come!
Like what I do? Then consider giving me a vote on the Witness page :) Thanks!
My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.
Posted from KURE!
Capacity for violence is a resource like any. It is imperative to decentralize control over that resource. If things are left to sort themselves out, we will get something like we have now: unfettered rule by the strongest, be it an alphabet soup like the American military machine very poorly controlled by the Congress - the DoD hasn't even been successfully audited for decades, a competing but weaker alphabet soup in some other powerful country (Russia is currently run by securocrats) or an individual warlord or dictator. The ultimate utopia is strict rule of law and transparency enforced by machines controlled by a DAO. Small groups made up of stupid, power-hungry and violent animals, that is, people like us, control every local monopoly of violence at present. Wars are started for private corporate gain as the arms industry influences the government. Hundreds of billions of dollars of public funds per year are unaccounted for. Why does the American public tolerate this shit?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yup, power corrupts, and those in power can't be trusted. Decentralized autonomy to self-rule as small communities is the ideal. A machine controlled governance is a dystopia, not a utopia, lol. Individual responsibility and integrity to moral truth is the true way forward... ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Small communities can be far from ideal. Sometimes, they can be quite toxic. And what exactly would keep some small communities from dominating others?
You misunderstand my point here. Machines (software) would only execute the will of the wider community with some important safeguards built in. Consider Steem, for example. Are we living under some kind of a yoke because we can't double spend our Steem because the protocol makes it impossible to do? In very similar ways, distributed ledger technology, smart contracts etc. could be used to do a lot more to make governance provably fair. Weapons technology is going autonomous anyway given enough time. I think it's imperative that there be no central control of autonomous weapons.
But how do you keep people from slipping from such lofty ideals? You don't. Besides, moral truth is non-objective. Everyone has ideas about what it is that differ from each other to varying degrees.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just think about how many times Trump
used/mentioned WikiLeaks in his election
campaign... but now his masters told him
different...puppet on a string
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My thoughts are that Assange wouldn't have even been charged by the DOJ but this will get some information to the public in the form of 'evidence' that may not have otherwise been seen. I think it's all part of the plan and in reality he's protected.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @thoughts-in-time)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit