RE: KARMA already have bad karma, Dallas Rushing @dallasrushing very untrustworthy. (Review of the first KARMA competition)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

KARMA already have bad karma, Dallas Rushing @dallasrushing very untrustworthy. (Review of the first KARMA competition)

in karma •  6 years ago 

Completely ridiculous.

On the first day of the contest, you submitted your videos and within 2 hours, you were complaining that you were scammed because you weren't sent the KARMA yet. You showed your true intentions early on.

You were then payed for your submissions.

I pm'd you to explain that you need to be a little more patient then a couple hours and that you would get KARMA for every submission that qualified.

You then proceeded to spastically write me 43 messages in a row. That's ridiculous and is hard to want to respond to.

After that you submitted a video doing a "good deed" in which you complained the entire video about how a random person treated you bad in response to your complaints about not being paid instantly. That's a ridiculous submission for this contest and does not qualify.

Then you submitted more videos and began to become toxic inside of the KARMA telegram group again. Dozens of people in the community complained about your behavior and asked an admin of the group to ban you for several reasons. After several requests and your behavior, the admin member decided to remove you from the group.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I do not agree on this, but I wont argue about it.

I like the idea of the KARMA project but the implementation of that contest was not trustworthy to me.