Fellowship of the bitches

The rise of the leftist movement in the US is a phenomenon that I find most fascinating and as much as I like to write or comment on this subject, I must admit it is something I cannot fully grasp. I understand that there are some people advocating the benefits of a communist regime, but still I don’t get it what it is exactly that these people think communism to be. I’m not the only one to say that most of these leftists have basically no idea what they’re talking about or what they want. Or maybe they do?

Last night, this disturbing image popped up in my FB feed, courtesy of Milo Yiannopoulos. After overcoming the inevitable shock, my first reaction was: ‘This poor idiot would be among the first to be sent to the gulag. Communism has no tolerance for your kind’. Took me a while to realize I was wrong and this kind of people can actually thrive under a totalitarian regime. Bitches like this can be as ruthless as men and can easily climb to the top. A totalitarian regime is not built upon intelligence, skills and morals (definitely, not morals), but upon bitchiness and a penchant for cruelty. I am sorry to say this but some women are very good at this.
When we think about the totalitarian regimes of the last century, we think mostly of the men that ruled the USSR or Nazi Germany. But there were some women too. Very nasty ones. In Romania for instance, among the Soviet trained party members entrusted with imposing a communist regime was a woman that rose to the pinnacle of power and was as feared as her male comrades. In September 1948, Ana Pauker appeared on the cover of “Time” magazine, being described as ‘the most powerful woman alive’.

She inspired terror and she has a great say in deciding who went to jail in the purges of the period. Many believe she was responsible for her own husband being sent to the gulag where he died. ‘Fat, sluggish and cold as a snake’ is one of descriptions that best describe the woman. And spiteful, I think, just like many of today’s Western feminist/communist activist. Just look at the character in the first picture, definitely spiteful.
Later on, few women rose to prominent positions in Romania, besides the Elena Ceausescu, wife of the famous dictator, a woman of no merits, known for a low intellect. The people hated her more than him, as she was described to be bitchy and evil. Among other things, she delighted in censoring the already dreary TV program, making sure women show little skin.

The cruelty of some women during the Nazi regime is also well documented. ‘Hitler’s furies’ is a blood-curling read.

Women can and will rise to the top and not necessarily based on looks. Hillary Clinton is proof of that. Talking about looks might sound frivolous, besides being politically incorrect, but the simple truth is women do care about looks and about rivals getting more attention than them. Women hate being threatened by better looking, younger females and those in a position of power will do anything to crush their rivals. (If you’ve ever worked in an office you’ll know what I mean).

Notice the message on the T-shirt is directed at other women

One of the appeals of being at the front of a perceived ‘political revolution’ is the idea that one day these bitches will rise to the top and make sure their more beautiful rivals will be sent to an imaginary gulag, together with the rich people and with the intellectuals.
I’m afraid that’s what today’s Western commies make of the communist slogan that all people are equal. In the world they dream of no one would be allowed to be better-looking, smarter or richer. Look at the picture above and try to imagine what a person like that would do given enough power. Or the numerous freaks we see at protests or on campuses. The slogan on that first image: 'society will thrive under communism' should actually read 'I will thrive under communism'.
Beware of bitches!

Thanks for reading

Images: 2, 3.