I'm curious to know, where/how you think native american indians fit in to the mud flood scenario. To me, it seems like there are a few variations of 2 different possible answers, 1 either native american indians heritage and story is clouded, diluted and obfuscated, either whomever found the cities, grabbed some brown skin children and threw them in the woods and voila now you have tribes to along with the agenda, 1,b or its just a fabrication entirely. 2, they were the remains of the past residence at these cities that were found, they couldn't remember the truth, 3, similar to 2, but the indians did not commute or affiliated with the city people, they lived how we are told they lived, but they also have stories that corroborate mud flood/finding abandoned/buried/destroyed cities.

what if, some old native american stories about lost cities refer to some of these things.

also, just one more thing to add, people do infact still build outrageous shit like this today, in 2018.. but not just any people, ridiculously rich, RICH people... but, to be fair... alot of the times when these people want a gilded/victorian type art/architecture, they almost entirely never ever pay a contractor to build new, they buy the old remnants and have them transported to their new location, even rooms and large chunks of these old houses.

this is all becoming more and more possible to me, i mean while it's 100% possible, at first it is almost harder to believe that a cataclysm of such magnitude and cover up happened 150+ years ago, than it is compared to thinking the earth is flat, but now after like 3 days, not only am i like it's 100% possible, because yeah not one single person from 1860 is alive today, you know no one, NO ONE who was alive back then, so not only is anything possible, first you were told.. catastrophe only happenes millions of years apart, then a decade later, we are told its more frequent, on a scale of only a few 100k years, then we are told (most recently) that it is indeed even more frequent, as close as 12,600 years ago.

so why not... get ready to be told it's even more frequent, only 160 years ago. I'm just hung up on how the native american indians fit into it all. Some of those sunken buildings, it would make sense to have atleast one window on those bottom floors, because even in homes your basement has to have windows, as a fire rule your home wont be approved via inspection unless every bedroom thats going to eventually have a person in it, HAS TO HAVE A WINDOW.

so i'm not sure how inspection code worked back then, it is a little odd seeing 100 windows wrapping around a building on the bottom floor, but like i said if each of those windows is for a room a piece, it's the same thing we do today, it's why apartments still have their bottom floors with windows, you wake up to an irrate fire burning up 3 quarters of the building, you cant run upstairs to go through the ground level door/window, might not even be able to leave through your front door at all, thats why you have the window there, but that's different and isn't the explanation for everything or something like

thanks for your content.