This was my first report, after which they took my camera (work) and deleted all the photos.
I do not understand what's so serious about this?
Can it be that the building is an architectural monument and it is against the law to disassemble the facade?
Or can it be that the machines are on the balance of the administration and are of historical value?
... This story lasted a long time. The building, in which was the oldest printing house and the newspaper "Soviet thought" (since 1918), suddenly someone needed and we were simply "asked" from there. We moved to another building in the summer, wanted to get rid of unnecessary rent of unused production facilities, and as a result we now pay even more for the building to which the machines were transported.
By the way, the same organization and party were engaged in transportation, as they covered roads on Work Street.
Here's how it works? Machines belong to the district administration, and for their storage we pay? Yes, I have some questions, because it does not fit in my head.
Of course, photos I restored! There is a lot of software, with which you can restore data from the USB flash drive even after formatting.
As a result, the building is now empty, waiting for its owner. And we pay for another building, where we work and for the fact that now there are machines that we do not need and not even ours.
Good work. Photography is Not a Crime.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit