I did. You're (almost) perfectly describing Merkle Trees.
RE: Open letter to Fuzzy, Steemit, and BeyondBitcoin
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Open letter to Fuzzy, Steemit, and BeyondBitcoin
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
How are you defining a blockchain?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Similarly to how Satoshi defined it: http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/private-blockchains/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see. Thanks for pinpointing the source of confusion. When Satoshi wrote that, no other viable method of securing a blockchain had been invented yet. His comment in the Bitcoin code is not a dogmatic definition to last forever.
Proof of work is not required for a secure blockchain. PoS, DPoS, and other methods have since been developed that are able to securely produce a chain of blocks linked together with cryptographic hash references to previous blocks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No. PoS and DPoS are regressions to Merkle Trees, that's the whole point. They are community-administered solutions (at best, if at all) to a problem that Satoshi solved technologically.
PoS at most is inelegant Proof-of-Work. Do your homework and understand why. Only then come back to further discuss.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit