Anyone can share pseudo-scientific nonsense, too. As the one raising the question, burden of proof is yours. How do radio waves, an infrared light frequency, cause symptoms of the flu, a viral infection? Scientific inquiry requires you to show evidence of your claim in a manner than can be tested, not an empty accusation you then ask others to disprove.
And why are you commenting here? This is an off-topic comment if ever there was one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I want to be free, but that doesn't mean I have to buy into your spammy nonsense. Stop trying to shift the burden of proof. I've been down the rabbit hole of such theories before, and found an absence of sound evidence. You're making a very fundamental scientific claim that radio waves inflict virus-like symptoms. This should be readily supported by evidence widely available in scholarly literature since radio has been studied for about a century now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It just keeps going around in circles, which isn't a useful usage of time: you keep talking about proof even though you can find it in the first comment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're the one going in circles. A youtube video with a talking head is not evidence, much less proof, of the connection you claim. This is almost flat earth level nonsense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit