I heard on the news today that a judge will decide whether Charlie Gard's parents will be allowed to take him home to die.
Yet again, a judge will be making a decision and not Charlie's parents and this has been the case right from the start and the good old British public accept it all without question.
I'm really pissed off about this whole thing but I seem to be in the minority and this pisses me off even more. Instead of me starting a textual rant on Steemit, I recommend that you read the articles @richq11 has written on the subject in which he details the case and manages to put my opinion on the matter across far better than I can.
https://steemit.com/life/@richq11/the-plight-of-charlie-gard
https://steemit.com/life/@richq11/hail-britannia-vanguard-of-the-nwo-an-update-on-charlie-gard
Anyway, now that you are familiar with the case here is a statement released by Charlies parents. I won't make any comments on it as I think the parents say it all with dignity and respect which is more than I think I would be able to do if I were in their situation. Anyway here is their statement which can be found at http://www.charliesfight.org/
This statement has been written by both Chris and I
The last 11 nearly 12 months have been the best, the worst and ultimately life changing months of our lives but Charlie is Charlie and we wouldn’t change him for the world. All our efforts have been for him.
This is one of the hardest things that we will ever have to say and we are about to do the hardest thing that we’ll ever have to do ewhich is to let our beautiful little Charlie go.
Put simply, this is about a sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy who was born with a rare disease, who had a real, genuine chance at life and a family who love him so very dearly and that’s why we fought so hard for him.
We are truly devastated to say that following the most recent MRI scan of Charlie’s muscles, as requested in the recent MDT meeting by Dr Hirano; as Charlie’s devoted and loving parents we have decided that it’s no longer in Charlie’s best interests to pursue treatment and we will let our son go and be with the angels.
The American and Italian team were still willing to treat Charlie after seeing both his recent brain MRI and EEG performed last week. He’s not brain dead (and never has been) he still responds to us, even now, but after reviewing the recent muscle MRI it was considered that Charlie’s muscles have deteriorated to the extent that it is largely irreversible and were treatment to work, his quality of life, would now not be that of one which we would want for our precious little boy. They both agreed that treatment should have been started sooner.
There is one simple reason for Charlie’s muscles deteriorating to the extent they are in now – TIME. A whole lot of wasted time. Had Charlie been given the treatment sooner he would have had had the potential to be a normal, healthy little boy. His muscles were in pretty good shape in January, although obviously weaker than a child of similar age, and his brain scan was that of a relatively normal child of his age. He may well have had some disabilities later on in life but his quality of life could have been improved greatly. The reason that treatment was not commenced in January orApril this year, was that Charlie was found to have ‘irreversible brain damage’ and treatment was considered as ‘futile’. Dr Hirano and Dr Bertini, together with other internationally renowned paediatric neurologists have now reviewed Charlie’s MRI’s and EEG’s which were performed in January and April respectively and they have confirmed that these MRI’s and EEG’s showed NO actual evidence of irreversible brain damage. Unfortunately Professor Hirano did not have access to the raw data and he based what he said in April on reports. We did not have access to these second opinions before the initial trial, hence why we are where we are today. Had we had the opportunity to have raw data of the MRIs and EEGs independently reviewed, we are convinced Charlie would be on treatment now and improving all the time.
However, we are now in July and our poor boy has been left to just lie in hospital for months without any treatment whilst lengthy court battles have been fought. We have been told time and time again that Charlie has a ‘progressive disease’ but rather than allow treatment for him with a medication that was widely accepted to have no side effects, Charlie has been left with his illness to deteriorate, sadly, to the point of no return.
We would like to say a few words in the hope that Charlie’s life will not be in vain. We have always acted in our sons best interests from the very beginning. We were told back in November that all his organs would fail and it was likely that we only had days left with him but to this day aside from Charlie’s need for ventilation not one organ has ‘failed’. We have always been led by Charlie. I promise every single one of you that we would not have fought this hard for our son if we thought that he was in pain or suffering. There has never been any proof that he was and we still don’t think that he’s in pain or suffering to this day. Having said that, we have decided to let our son go and that’s for one reason and one reason only. It is because the prospect of improvement is unfortunately now too low for Charlie. Our doctors in America and Italy were still willing to treat Charlie after reviewing the MRI head scan from July 2017 as they still felt that there was a chance of meaningful improvement in Charlie’s brain. However due to the deterioration in his muscles, there is now no way back for Charlie. Time that has been wasted. It is time, that has sadly gone against him.
We now have 7 experts supporting therapy for Charlie’s condition which I think is proof that it was more than reasonable to try it. Nucleosides are simply a powder that would’ve gone into Charlie’s milk and are compounds which all of us in this room produce naturally. Unfortunately, Charlie can’t produce these due to his disease, which is why he is the way he is. We want people to realise that we have been speaking to parents whose children were just like Charlie before starting treatment and now some of them are walking around like normal children. We wanted Charlie to have that chance too.
Our son has an extremely rare disease for which there is no accepted cure but that does not mean that this treatment would not have worked, and it certainly does not mean that this shouldn’t have been tried. We have only been asking for a 3 month trial of treatment to see if there was any improvement. We have been asking for this short trial for the past 8 months. Charlie did have a real chance of getting better if only therapy was started sooner. It was never false hope as confirmed by many experts. Now we will never know what would have happened if he got treatment but it’s not about us, it’s never been about us, it’s about what’s best for Charlie now. At the point in time when it has become too late for Charlie we have made the agonising decision to let him go.
This has also never been about ‘parents know best’. We have continuously listened to experts in this field and it has raised fundamental issues, ethically, legally and medically – this is why the story of one little boy from two normal everyday people has raised such conflicting opinions and ferocious arguments worldwide.
All we wanted to do was take Charlie from one world renowned hospital to another world renowned hospital in the attempt to save his life and to be treated by the world leader in mitochondrial disease. We feel that we should have been trusted as parents to do so but we will always know in our hearts that we did the very best for Charlie and I hope that he is proud of us for fighting his corner.
We will have to live with the ‘what if’s’ which will haunt us for the rest of our lives but we’re thinking about what’s best for our son. We have always believed that Charlie deserved a chance at life and we knew that his brain was not as bad it was made out to be and that’s why we continued.
We completely understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion and this was always going to be a matter which would cause a huge debate in who’s right and who’s wrong. In truth, there are no winners here. One thing is for sure though. We know deep within our hearts that we have always had Charlie’s best interests in the forefront of our minds and despite what some people think of us, we will try to walk away from this with our heads held high. As I said, we know the truth, and in our hearts we know that we have done all of this for our darling little Charlie. We have never done this for selfish reasons and kept him alive because we couldn’t bear to lose him.
Charlie had a real chance of getting better. It’s now unfortunately too late for him but it’s not too late for others with this horrible disease and other diseases. We will continue to help and support families of ill children and try and make Charlie live on in the lives of others. We owe it to him to not let his life be in vain.
We would like to thank our current legal team who have worked tirelessly to try and save Charlie’s life and they have not asked for a single penny. They won’t even let us buy them a coffee. They have done it out of the kindness of their hearts because they believed in us and they certainly believed in Charlie. We would like to thank everybody who has supported us throughout this journey in this country and thousands of people worldwide and we also would like to thank the staff at GOSH who have looked after Charlie and kept him comfortable and stable for so long. The care he has received from the nurses who’ve cared for him has been second to none. But most of all, we would like to thank Charlie for the joy he has brought to our lives. The love we have for you is too much for words and we love you so very much.
Despite the way that our beautiful son has been spoken about sometimes, as if he not worthy of a chance at life, our son is an absolute WARRIOR and we could not be prouder of him and we will miss him terribly. One little boy has brought the world together and whatever people’s opinions are, no one can deny the impact our beautiful son has had on the world and his legacy will never ever die. Charlie has had a greater impact on and touched more people in this world in his 11 months than many people do in a life time. We could not have more love and pride for our beautiful boy. His body, heart and soul may soon be gone, but his spirit will live on for eternity and he will make a difference to people’s lives for years to come. As his mum and dad, we will make sure of that. We owe that to our boy. We will do our utmost to ensure that no parents have to go through what we have been through and the next Charlie that comes along WILL get this medicine before it’s too late and Charlie will save many more lives in the future, no doubt about that.
We are struggling to find any comfort or peace with all this, but one thing that does give us the slightest bit of comfort, is that we truly believe that Charlie may have been too special for this cruel world.
We truly believe that any parent would have wanted the same thing, if they knew what we knew.
We are now going to spend our last precious moments with our son Charlie, who unfortunately won’t make his 1st birthday in just under 2 weeks’ time, and we would ask that our privacy is respected at this very difficult time.
Mummy and Daddy love you so much Charlie, we always have and we always will and we are so sorry that we couldn’t save you. We had the chance but we weren’t allowed to give you that chance.
Sweet dreams baby. Sleep tight our beautiful little boy.
Charlie Matthew William Gard
Our hero!
I'm saddened beyond words by this... and angry! This sounds the death knell for individual rights (something that has never existed in the UK) Obamacare has similar provisions- "End of life decisions- they're called, but it isn't the individual or doctors that will be making the decisions, it's the government.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I knew you'd be angry when you read this. Things are getting worse and worse. They introduced secret family courts in the UK a few years ago and the British public were silent as always.
Here's an article which talks a bit about it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/16/the-terrifying-tale-of-how-britains-most-secret-court-imprisoned/
As you've said before, we are on a slippery slope but unfortuntely the British public appear to trust and have faith in a system that if put under any sort of scrutity would be shown to be the corrupt cesspool it is. They are too busy watching Coronation Street to notice what is happening under their noses.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's what happens when you give up your guns!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Government controlled medicine at its worst, who the hell are they to dictate to the parents how their child will be treated? It makes me sick to my stomach to watch the British government murder this child, and for what gain?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @jimbobbill, @alioops told me to read your article. Ive been reading about charlie on and off for the last few months and what angers me most is the way that the media slowly turned on the parents! They have made out like these people are just being difficult for the sake of it, and being really judgy when they got emotional in court - who in their right mind wouldnt scream and kick off if it was their baby in question!!!
I am absolutely heart broken for this family - why does the court have so much decision making power over the parents??? No-one is saying that they are not 'expert' in what they are doing, but if the parents feel that strongly about this treatment, why not let it happen??!! Best case charlie might have improved, worst case the parents know that they have exhausted all possibilities.
I think a very dangerous precident is set when courts and doctors have more say than the parents. You see it happening with other areas of parenting now too (vaccination, schooling etc etc) and parents are becoming nothing more than glorified babysitters. Fucking disgusting!! I dont have children, and dont know that i ever will, but the thought terrifies me because of state involvement.
I hope that charlie's parent can find peace, say goodbye to their angel and move on knowing that they fought the best fight possible.
Thanks for sharing this
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The truth of this story not only brings me to tears but gets me soooooooooo angry!!!!!
Not a single soul - government, legal or otherwise has any right to dictate what is reasonable care for anyone elses child. Least of all when that child could have had medical care that could have saved his life.
And if all those coulds are too much uncertainty for some people then think on it this way. Isnt it better that theres 0.01% chance something can save a life than nothing at all???
And since when is it the court's job to decide what care the child gets over their parents??? And on top of that poor Charlie cant even be at home comfortably with his family at the end. All because a judge thinks he's God!?!?
Jim, I, like you am enraged by this. Charlie could have been helped half a year ago. But noooooo, those TWATS in legal rags insisted on dragging this out.
Upvoted and resteemed. More people need to know this story. The story about how the state helped euthanise a baby that potentially could have been saved were it not for their fillibustering...........
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the reply. It's good to know there are others who are as pissed off as me about this. Pretty much everyone I speak to about this keeps coming out with the same bullshit that "you have to trust the experts" or "the doctors know best". I'd like to see how they would feel if they took their child into hospital and were told they couldn't take him/her back out again because the doctors said so. This case has illustrated to me how subservient most people are to the state and how accepting of the system people are. How much more evidence to people need before they realise that the system/state is corrupt at it's core?
Check out this story I found (you are probably already aware of it). At least the child isn't dying I suppose but imagine being told you were too thick to look after your own child and have he/she forcefully removed !!!
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2017/07/parents_with_intellectual_disa.html
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I hadn't seen that story but it's a fucking disgrace. I am with you 100%!!!!
They throw up societal guidelines and barriers as to why almost anyone can have a child, even those anyone with half a brain cell knows shouldn't have children. And then you have a child and the 'state' says you're now, by their definition, not fit.
WELL I SAY THE STATE ISN'T FIT TO TIE IT'S OWN FUCKING SHOE LACES!!!!!!!!!
And those mindless, braindead little statists who regurgitate the bullshit lines like, "..you have to trust the experts.." or "..doctors know best.." OMFG!!! People get a brain of your own.
Experts know fuck all, we just believe they do so we put our 'faith' in them and don't even get started on doctors............
Doctors only know best about their bank balance and what rotalty cheques they're gonna get from Pharma!!!!!
Any and all official state bodies can lick my @$#*s!!!!!
Most people won't figure anything out until it's too late but he worst are the ones who know and understand but refuse to accept regardless.
Another rant over............but there are many pent up inside. But I am very much with you on this one sir. People put faaaaaaar to much blind faith in SCIENCE and the High Priests of that faith - Doctors.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just had a look at your account and can see that you don't have much SP. Since you are a regular reader/replier to my posts I am trying to work out how I can delegate some SP to you which will help you build up you SP a bit faster. It won't be much (probably 100-150SP) as I only have 620 in total but every bit helps. You get to keep all curation rewards from delegated SP. I hope to be able to work it out pretty soon so hopefully you should see some delegated SP in your wallet today at some point.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
WOW!!
Dude that's an awesome offer. You really don't need to give anything you've clearly worked really hard to achieve. I'm not going to lie, I'm very grateful. Of course if it powers me to make stronger posts and curation on other posts including yours then that's welcome.
Hopefully if it builds up fast enough I can pay it back/forward.
However ultimately, thank you very much kind sir.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't really lose anything apart from perhaps a small amount in potential curation rewards but because the SP is delegated I can just take it back whenever. As usual with these sorts of things it is never as easy as I think it will be and I might have to wait until I get home to download some sort of wallet or something. There is no functionality as far as I can see within the Steemit website to do it so I will have to find another way. It is possible though.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well I will use it wisely and honourably.
"With great power, comes great responsibility." Hehe 😉
Yeah I get the feeling that there are a few aspects of Steemit that could be tweeked moving forward from the Beta.
That being said whatever it takes you to delegate that to me as long as it doesn't become too much trouble.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Done
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 1.20 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @jimbobbill.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit