Maybe maybe not. The reality is that there needs to be some kind of Common Sense laws on Amelia. And plenty of other countries have that and there's no issues. In Europe the media isn't allowed to lie. There are laws on the books to keep them injective. I don't know about you but I don't really give a shit about the Free Press in terms of letting the media say whatever they want just because you feel bad for them. Free Press wasn't created because the founding fathers felt sympathetic to multi-billionaire is being able to lie. It was created to keep the people informed. If it's not doing that job than it needs to be changed
I could say the same thing
While I absolutely agree that guns is partially responsible for these shooters I shudder at the suggestion that guns be taken out of the hands of innocent people
That sounds a little too "behind the iron curtain" for my taste. It's a long sho
what's really lacking is any sense of decency by the public. Mass shooters wouldnt shoot ppl if the public didn't glorify it
lapping up every lurid minute of it. And there's no way to legislate decency. It has been tried.
Posted using Partiko Android
Who determines in Europe what is a lie and what is the truth. It is only the people that hold the power.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Express determine it. It's not that hard. Left Linder than right wing as a like that support corruption like to up the skate things and make it seem harder than it is. But it's really not.
Reality is fairly easy to see when there is bias. And when a network intentionally misleads people. As CNN admitted to doing. For example. See you in admitting to Millis leading people would be an example of the time that it could be enforced
but it's really not that difficult. Experts are fairly good at it. And they do it all the time for other Industries. For example there are laws against false advertising. Well who determines if an advertisement is false? The experts do. And they do a fuck good job of it
a certain building codes and buildings have to adhere to a certain safety standard. Well who determines if the building is safe? The experts. And there's never been an example of those experts getting it wrong.
Fire safety. The experts determine it again.
restaurants are required to go through food safety inspections and make sure that they're clean. Who determines if they're cleaned? The experts it investigate.
the reality is that there's never really been a good example of when these things are bad. And even if they don't do the perfect job they're still far better than if they hadn't done
the rhetoric and talking points against these kinds of sayings is not motivated by any kind of factual basis. It's motivated by talking points created by people who do not want to be regulated. Usually billionaires that don't want regulations and so they create talking points to scare Ordinary People.
But the reality is it perfectly works fine. The experts in the agency is assigned to it do a good job of determining those
Anti-regulation talking points are typically misleading at best and outright false at worst. And they're never found coming from any other source than billionaires. Whether it's billionaires themselves or super Pacs funded by billionaires that's where all of the anti-regulation talking points originate
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ever hear of pay offs.. It's a corrupt world out there.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit