A person may be an objectivist and still be regarded as subjective in some sense. Objectivism is an ideology which holds that the proper method of judging is that based upon objective standards. A person may be subjective but is only a fool if he is not an objectivist. Both categories are very new; the earlier conception being one of the truest reality, namely any half-truth or error. In other words, neither is right or wrong.
Subjectivity means being subjective, and objective means being objective. A person who is not subjective is therefore not an objectivist. In order to be able to have an unbiased opinion, you must make an effort to look at both the sides and then determine what is the best choice.
Some may think that being subjective can mean being as much of a fool as someone who is completely objective. To be objective means being as honest and truthful as possible. The former is what true objectivity is all about. Subjectivity, however, is something else entirely. It has nothing to do with being accurate and truthful, which are two completely different concepts. A subjective person, unlike an objective person, will not necessarily tell you exactly how he/she feels.
Subjectivity is also related to the state of mind of a person. When we are subjective, we are in the "zone" or trance like state that we find so comfortable. If we were to be in an objective state we would be in a more analytical and rational state. In such a state, the person would be more focused on analyzing the facts and making decisions based on them.
In order for a person to be objective, he/she would need to be totally honest and truthful about his/her beliefs. It may seem that there is no way to be both. However, this is only because a person can be a completely objective and totally subjective at the same time. There are some people who believe that people can be completely subjective while other people think that people cannot be either. at the same time. Either way, when you are completely objective, you are not subjective.
The only way to get an unbiased opinion in either case is to sit back, relax and let the person make his/her own choices. in his/her life. After all, you are helping him/her make the decisions about what is right and wrong, and what is the best for them.
Another reason why objectivism versus subjectivism are important is because it relates to our ability to make good decisions. With objectives, a person's thoughts and feelings cannot be changed by another person's thoughts and feelings. With subjectivism, it is their perception of reality and their feelings that can be changed.
So, the answer to the question is - objectivism versus subjectivism - is neither! What is the difference? Neither is right or wrong, but what is best for them.
The biggest difference is the quality of the decisions we make with both objectivism and subjectivism versus objectivism versus subjectivism. With subjectivism, the person is still making a decision. However, they are choosing which way they want to go. For example, they could choose to go with subjectivism and decide that a certain path is not worth going down, but decide that it is worth going down anyway. They could also choose to go with subjectivism and make the choice to follow another direction.
On the other hand, with objectivism, they are forced to choose. They are forced to choose whether they will go with the belief or not, because the beliefs and feelings that they hold are in their subconscious. and not in their conscious mind.
It takes us some time to make up our minds. However, if we are forced to make decisions, then we can learn how to make up our minds, and therefore decide what is right and wrong. This is not the case with subjectivism.
To sum it up, objectivism and subjectivism both have their pros and cons. However, when choosing between them, we must consider the quality of the decision making involved. You have to be able to make your own mind up and decide what is right and wrong. in this case it is either way. Therefore, it depends on what you want to achieve.