Dangerous electrical failure can be MH370 crash: the case

COLUMBIA, SC - A series of unexpected electrical and other failures is still missing, according to a lawsuit filed by 44 families of missing people in the United States, Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 due to the Hindu Ocean could be the cause of the accident. .
The lawsuit filed in the US District Court in South Carolina against Boeing on Friday issued seven incompleteness to the plane's cabin depression, which could cause the crew to lose consciousness, the plane's transporter stopped its infection, and the aircraft was able to fly it was not unexpected while going out of fuel. .
The case has been filed with Gregory Keith, a special administrator for the family who loves the loved ones on the flight. It charges 44 people as plaintiffs. This case was filed in South Carolina because Boeing 787 has created a huge new plant for the construction of the Dreamliner. Flight 370 was a Boeing 777 and would not say where the case was made.
Boeing did not comment on the pending cases, but the company's thoughts continued with the dead person on Flight 370, Boeing spokesman Tom Kim said in a statement.
Mary Shivo, a lawyer representing the family of Flight 370, former Inspector General of the US Department of Transportation. He did not respond to the comments sought by an email.
On March 8, 2009, the plane was flying with 280 passengers from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Malaysia, Australia and China postponed the search for nearly three years in the South Indian Ocean on 17 January.
The case notes that the search has ended in search of the aircraft and it has been said that due to stagnation in the final stage, "economic and non-economic damages, mental and physical pain, distress and emotional pain and suffering" for the people of the aircraft and their families Does not ask.
Boeing does not use the technology available on its 777 aircraft, which allows them to track all the time and helps to find flight and cockpit voice recorders easily, the law says.
Boeing knew about the aircraft's design flaws, including the faulty wiring near the risky source of emergency oxygen supply in the aircraft crew.
"Accidents have happened and / or the immovable vital system of missing aircraft allows a huge and cascading sequence of unstable electrical vulnerabilities ... so that it can not be impossible to navigate the plane or to contact the ground stations left on the plane until the airline flew. Without the ability to contact or control the aircraft E is. "
The victim's family has filed other cases.
Among them, in March of last year, 12 days before the date of the case against Malaysian Airlines, 12 Chinese families who had relatives with relatives filed a lawsuit in Beijing. Its name is boiling and rolls-oys for jet engines. Other cases were filed by the family in Kuala Lumpur with 32 passengers.
A month ago, a Malaysian woman and her two young sons were her husband S. Filed a case against the airline for compensation of $ 7.6 million for the loss of peptonon. Australian woman Jennifer Chong, whose husband Ching Lin Tin was on the flight, claims critics of Australia, and feels the airline negligence to ensure passengers' safety.
According to a document submitted to the Australian Federal Court in April 2016, the family of four Australian passengers demanded a compensation of $ 200,000 from Malaysian Airlines.
In June 2016, the Malaysian boys' father, J. Jing Hong, was a passenger Malaysia Airlines and a foreign passport in the first legal case against the government.