Image source: Here https://pixabay.com/en/sorry-apology-apologize-regret-1185857/
The irresponsibility practiced are numerous these days. Always existed, however, have increased dramatically due to the lack of accountability of made. When you come to the surface, its practitioners appear then as true martyrs who did not know what they were doing and cry for forgiveness. The forgiveness of "don't give consequences of acts that practiced".
Exactly. They say "Excuse me" only as a way not to take the consequences of their mistakes. Such people assume that their actions will only become considered if disclosed, unmasked. Otherwise, enjoy the benefits and feel the distinguished: those that everything may forward to the other, poor mortals.
Exposed situations, people crave until the forgiveness only as an attempt to "don't punish, please!". There is a request for forgiveness, is not repentance. It is only the not wanting to take responsibility by practiced and rid themselves of the consequences.
The result: a term that is already being and will still be writing several times in this text. It means "natural result, likely or have a question; end result". What if derived from an action practiced.
Some people act without thinking of the consequences of acts, however, the number of those who know that they are not acting properly and even then they do, is much greater. "The Wise", "Those who like to take advantage" are always in search of opportunities and they will always exist. It is natural to live to imagine what is behind this or that attitude. Those who are well intentioned are skilled in the art of dissimulation. Some time ago I wrote about "who speaks the truth, does not deserve punishment". In this text it is clear that in taking the act done there is no need for an increase in the penalty, but there is the exemption from the consequences of their actions. There are no corporal punishment, there are consequences.
In 2015, a Brazilian was executed in Indonesia by entering with drugs hidden in the surf board. The penalty for this offense is death. It was reported that he had already done it other times, without having been discovered. Already stuck, waiting for the execution, begged pardon saying being completely sorry for what he did. There was repentance and yes terrified by who would face: the loss of his life as a result of what he had done. This is an extreme example. In no time, there is in this case the defense of the death penalty. Just quote that people even knowing what can happen to them, believe that "will blank", no one will know and will be exempt from any punishment.
It is current practice among the masked the "I don't know". Not knowing does not absolve anyone of responsibility facing the facts. Governments use this speech when in its efforts appear irregularities and want to exempt them. It is possible that people coming are acting without their knowledge. Even so remain responsible. The speech more assertive in these situations is "I'll see immediately what in fact is happening"
Then, assign those who were acting improperly the consequences actions, as well as to take responsibility by made of same.
A father corrects his son for having caused a damage to the neighbor, however, repairs the damage caused. He responds by his son. The law does not accept that an individual claims not to know her and therefore have it infringed. Those who did so responds in the same way as if he knew what he was doing. Much of the permissiveness stems from right people, but who feel uncomfortable in pointing out the ulterior motives when they perceive. "Ah, I was upset to talk". It is the comment most common when questioned.
We should not accuse or criticize that moralists. Just pointing out that the consequences for the actions of each are taken by them.