Toleration is the act of respecting another party's rights and interests. This is an important concept in the context of democracy because it allows citizens to recognize one another as equals in a moral-political sense. However, it is also an important concept in the context of religious harmony. A minority must be given the opportunity to accept the dominant position in order for toleration to work. In practice, this often means allowing the majority to tolerate the dissent of a minority.
The moral demand for tolerance is a surprisingly complex issue. It involves a multitude of considerations, from the merits of the coexistence paradigm to the best method of achieving a state of social stability. In particular, the tolerant racist must not only overcome his racist impulses, but must also overcome his racist beliefs. While toleration certainly has its place, it is not a panacea. Moreover, a tolerant society should not be expected to have a perfect record of harmony.
There is a toleration aficionado in every group. The first is the esteem conception, characterized by a positive attitude toward beliefs and practices considered to be ethically valuable by the adherents. On the other hand, the coexistence hypothesis is characterized by groups with roughly equal power.
The best way to exemplify the virtue of tolerance is to show a lack of prejudice in the eyes of the tolerating party. If they were not frightened by your racism, they would be much more tolerant of your racist attitudes. Similarly, if you were not a racist, you would be much less likely to adopt the same irrational zeal. But, even with a lack of racial bias, there are many cases in which toleration is a necessity, if not a choice. For example, monarchs have to tolerate dissent, or the church has to tolerate homosexuality.
As with any complex issue, the answer to the question of what is the best way to achieve toleration is a combination of pragmatic and meta-rational factors. The best way to achieve toleration is to establish a common framework for social life, governed by norms that the tolerating parties can agree on. They must not, however, favor a particular ethical or cultural group over others. And they must not ignore the many other ways to attain a state of social harmony.
Other measures of toleration include assessing the potential for conflict. In order to do this, it is essential to identify what the major players are, their powers and resources, and what is required to achieve toleration. When it comes to establishing the best course of action, the wise men of the world have said it is better to be safe than sorry. By implementing the best policy for tolerance, we can achieve peace and prosperity, as well as reduce human suffering.
Aside from the obvious, the most important and practical way to achieve toleration is to set limits on the scope of toleration. These limits must be based on sound principles and be justifiable in a non-arbitrary manner. With these principles in place, we can achieve the noble aims of tolerance without violating the sanctity of the rule of law.