I went into bitcoin talk one day and read his posts, they literally feel like reading the works of history (which they are). It definitely could be Charlie Lee. I definitely don't think it's Craig Wright. I would also be disappointed if it was. I agree that whoever it is, he definitely was manyyyyyyyyy steps ahead and knew the ramifications of what could happen if his identify was made known. I also feel sometimes like Charlie Lee in public comes off overly simple, when he's clearly a genius. I feel like he's almost at times keeping it simple on purpose to not show that he could be satoshi. He's denied it a few times, but honestly if I were him, I would never admit it.
It's amazing how history happens. Maybe one day in a few centuries, some archaeologist or something will find proof that charliee is satoshi... on the super advanced blockchain that i can't even envision where tech will be at that point (if the earth survives, lol but not really lol)
I would say, you should write your own article on this subject. Let us know what you have found in your reading on the subject?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I've written an article on the mystery of Satoshi and who he/she might be;
https://steemit.com/satoshi/@thedubliner/the-age-of-satoshi
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just seen Charlie in an interview and he seems very straightfaced and down to business. A bit like what people have reported Satoshi spoke like on his posts during the early days. Got me thinking.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit