Hey, minnowboosters!

in m2c •  7 years ago 


How about you stop recruiting for your gang by spamming the newbs?

The Steem reward pool is a common pot.

When you devise strategies to increase your take from it you disadvantage everybody else.

Gangs band together to increase rewards for the insiders at the expense of everybody else.

The sooner rewards are distributed by people voting content they like, rather than content that pays, the sooner we get back to being what Steem is supposed to be about.

Rewarding authors for adding value to the blockchain.

So, all you gangbangers, yes that includes @curie and the discord pukes that ban people that speak the truth to them, can kiss my ass.

All the money in the world won't change the truth, nor hide the shame, of y'all being a**holes, eh?



Have a perfectly peaceful day.

Vote FBA King of the World!

Keep working, stop paying.

No war, but the class war!!

Minds.com

How to win in court!

How to win in court for far less!!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

#introduceyourself/#introducemyself

The “introduceyourself/introducemyself” tag is for creating one introductory post that tells us about you. Users are encouraged to use this tag exclusively for that, and not to reuse it.

Is it ok to spam your commercial activities on all the newbs posts?
I know @minnowbooster is a golden boy and can do no wrong in the eyes of many, but taking advantage of the newbs because they dont know that services such as these make it impossible for them to get rewards once they stop paying for them is bs.
Correcting me, and letting them slide is bs, too.
Except this is likely the end of my abuse of the tag but it is business as usual for them.
This hypocrasy, intentional, due to a lack of resources/will, or not is holding us back.
We already have 800k+ people out there bad mouthing steem as pointlessly corrupt.

Oh, and f' the people in the neck that spoke against me in the commitees.

The majority of bot comments I see are useless and annoying. We really need to figure out how to incentivize downvoting bot comments that individuals feel are spam or add no value to steemit. I've been working on a couple ideas that I hope will help.

Glad to hear it, Patrice, it is frustrating when i watch the too big to be flaggeds using their influence to abuse the platform.
Either the rules apply to the golden boys or we might as well let the price tank and have countermeasures in place for when the abusers come back to what we rebuilt in their absence.

We've missed much upward price pressure because stinc wants to enable abuse and not be subjected to restraint.
Bring back the n2 and the whale experiment at 100mv and we wouldnt have lost a year to the abusers.
Most of those 800k newbs would have had an incentive to stay, but the greedy bastards with the keys didnt see it that way.

Sorry if i sound bitter. I am.

Which Minnowbooster activity are you referring to by

they dont know that services such as these make it impossible for them to get rewards once they stop paying for them is bs.

?

All this ganging up, including @curie, obtain an advantage in the math unavailable to individuals.
Just as vote sellers increase their stakes to sell more votes snowballing to overwhelming the pool, so too do the collusive gangs.
Eventually only favored gang members will get rewards.
Once your name is on their no vote list your number is canceled and you dont eat.
The quality of content you bring to the chain is irrelevant.
Because the socials will have a lock on it.
Look at the one star steemsmart offered me, already i have been disfavored, not due to the quality of my material but due to its content.
I cant get a curie vote even when there was only 1200 daily authors, again, not because of the quality but because of the content. They only support corporate speak.

Sounds like you want to complain...

Oh damn, now my sides are hurting, too.

First just my hide was chapped and now my sides are splitting,...

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Interesting debate. On one hand, a Gang (or a Union like the EU maybe haha) may be bad like you said. But on the other hand, where does Gangism end and Capitalism begin? Where is the line between what might be bad and what might be maybe kind of like good if you know what I mean? Love Batman. I love capitalism. I love competition. I love supply and demand.

I love the pursuit in becoming a bigger Whale of a Tale on Steemit and in life in general.

And some do good in life. But some people do better. That is what life is all about. The struggle inspires the best, not the worse, in people.

Like American Idol for example, so many people tryout but fail. But we keep on trucking. We keep on Choo Choo like an Engine that Could. Yes We Can Said Obama haha.

Bob The Builder agrees.

Well, we could cooperate, eh?

Just like religious training of the young insures that they stay that brand of religion, so too does economic training insure that same result.

Here is a novel from 1887 that lays it out pretty well.
This one lays it out in essays.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-communist-anarchism

If you are only going to learn from inside the box your teachers give you, dont be surprised when you find out that you are a slave of the people that paid that teacher.

Yes, maybe, we can try to cooperate. Thanks for sharing the http://Glutenberg.org website & I read that small book of the man that slept for 113 years to the year 2000. I like the Glutenberg website as they have over 60,000 free eBooks, or something like that, and I wonder if they could have a blockchain or have an app with Steemit or something.

I am looking at Communist Anarchy which you gave me.

I like making government smaller. I like that I can agree with anarchists if we both can work to make abusive government to shrink.

I love local communities. I love being social. I love it when people freely choose to come together to work together and to help each other out because they want to sometimes to help each other out but only if they want and only when they want to and not out of requirements and through taxes or police or too much force or anything like that. I like letting families and individuals choose and letting them be the kings and queens of their kingdoms, their houses, their land, their properties, whatever they buy, whatever they own, to do whatever they want both good and bad with their stuff on their property. More freedoms is better.

Yep, rule by force is the disease, who and how are symptoms.

Glad to know you are not afraid of ideas not spoonfed to you by a nanny state.
Theanarchistlibrary.org has more reading than we can ever do in one lifetime.
This is a good one, short, too.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-there-is-no-communism-in-russia

Id like to visit viet nam and talk to the old people.
Im betting very few remember Ho preaching from the books i spread, too.
We get our info from many of the same sources from the early 20th century.

I was in Vietnam for 5 years & people talked about Ho Chi Minh and Vietnamese in Saigon say they don't like Ho Chi Minh, socialism, and they are forced to pay more money when they shop in Hanoi than other local Vietnamese in Hanoi. Many times, Vietnamese have told me that the north and the south Vietnamese are still divided against each other. I was in Hanoi and didn't like it. I felt better in Saigon. I like Russia. I see revolutions happening in Russia now.

Yeah, its the application of the ideas that trips them up.
Communism is a better system, but you cant force it on folks.
They have to choose it because it benefits them better.

Nestor Mahkno is my hero, but he only fought russians, he defended the ukraine from them before the 'revolution'.

I do not like communism because it does not reward me to work harder and harder like capitalism does. If we all get the same in communism, then why work, compete, try?

Itt a matter of switching money for esteem.
If money is the sole evaluator of success then crapitalism is the game, but if the girls are taught to seek productive guys because money no longer enslaves the havenots to the haves, then productive guys will have reasons to contribute.
Also, as long as the current distribution of money exists you dont stand a chance at standing out, but with everybody on a level playing field, you could invent something that makes you a household name and folks with money couldnt steal your idea as easily.

Every time I see these memes of yours, I enjoy them more. I just looked at the @curie web page. Looks angelic. What do they do that is bad for the platform?

Yeah, i do put my heart into those.

@curie is the original 'only approved content' gang.
They discriminate against anybody that doesnt kiss their ass.
Their karma is catching up to them.

By banding together they put everybody else at a disadvantage in receiving rewards from the common pool.
Large sp gets more rewards, if that sp sits idle the small sp gets more.
@curie said fuck all that and used @ned's posting key to vote their crap posts to trending every payday.
Now, its coming home to roost, they dont have an advantage in the math to buy friends and nobody gives a shit about them, if they ever did.

Selfishness ruins everything, and what goes around, comes around.

Huh. Interesting. Funny, but when I introduced myself, two of the people that said g'day are still good mates on Steemit. Maybe that was just dumb luck, but i'm glad they were there xxx

I know we have a good community, just a few bad apples, some with alot of stake.

The mb bot didnt spam you?

There ya go. Now we're cooking with grease :) I see you already helped clean up my brother's intro page. Thanks.

1353608.jpg