Analysis on Profitability of Magic Credits (Magic Dice Shares)

in magicdice •  6 years ago 

image.png

Hey guys! I recently started becoming quite invested in the Magic Dice casino made by @magicdice as I have quite a lot of shares and I enjoy gambling. I posted an analysis on Magic Credits more than 3 weeks ago and back then I calculated it was incredibly profitable, breaking even at 14 MCs per STEEM wagered.

However, those calculations were done with some outdated information. Recently (less than an hour ago), on the Magic Dice Discord I was informed that the distribution will be from the circulating supply, rather than the total supply. This means at the current distribution rate, our payouts are more than doubled! This has prompted me to recalculate the profitability of Magic Credits

The parameters

  • 19.5% has been distributed, but let's say 20% (therefore 3.5 billion shares in circulation) which is 50% of the total supply
  • The current volume will stay constant (I'm predicting it will increase but let's be conservative)
  • The current volume is 12.8 million STEEM during the past month source
  • We earn 1.8% of volume (at most 10% of house edge goes to referrals)
  • Investors want 20% ROI on a risky asset
  • NOTE: All of these parameters apart from the first one are conservative, therefore estimates on profitability is likely to be conservative

The maths

Let's begin by calculating monthly profitability per 1 million shares.
We can do this by dividing 1 million shares by circulating supply, then multiplying it by 2% of the monthly volume. This yields us a return of around 65.83 STEEM per month, or 789.91 per year. Assuming investors want 20% ROI, 1 million Magic Credits are worth 3950 STEEM.

However, how much can we expect to lose to mine 1 million shares? Currently, you'll earn 25 Magic Credits per 1 STEEM wagered, so you'll need 40,000 STEEM wagered to earn 1 million shares. At a 2% house edge, you can expect to lose around 800 STEEM before earning 1 million shares.

That means right now by gambling, statistically you have are making a 594% return on your "investment"

What if we factored in growth?

  • Let's assume a 10% per month growth rate

At a 10% compounding growth rate, we can expect a YEARLY volume of 273 million STEEM, which means approximately 4,914,000 STEEM profit, factoring in the 10% referral bonus.

It will take 9.8 million STEEM (3.5% of 7,000,000,000 divided by 25) wagered before the next distribution halving, then another 28 million (5% of 7,000,000,000 divided by 12.5) wagered for the next halving, then another 56 (previous amount multiplied by 2) million wagered for the next halving, then another 112 million wagered for the next halving, so we'll be 77 million STEEM wagered into the next halving. At this point we'll have a total supply of around 74.6% of the total which equals around 5.2 billion tokens.

Therefore, using our previous formula, you'll expect around 945 STEEM per year which roughly equates to 4725 STEEM worth of tokens.

Price of STEEM

1 million MCs might be worth 4725 STEEM which at the current STEEM prices might only be worth around $1300, but what if STEEM doubled in value, or even tripled? The value of your Magic Credits would double and triple with it. @dreamryder007 suggested STEEM at $2 or even at $20, well you do the maths...

  • 4725 STEEM at $2 per STEEM = $9450
  • 4725 STEEM at $20 per STEEM = $94500

However, there is high variability...

I've lost around 1,400 STEEM, some of this was lost while I was wagering when it was 100 MCs per STEEM wagered, which means I should have around 6-7 million shares but I have nowhere near that amount.

Statistics aren't always on your side, so BE CAUTIOUS WHEN YOU GAMBLE AND NEVER GAMBLE MORE THAN YOU'RE PREPARED TO LOSE!!

If you have never played before and found this article interesting, please consider clicking here (my referral link) to login for your first time! You won't lose anything for using it and I'll earn 10% of the house edge!

Reminders

  • These estimates are fairly conservative
  • Only gamble what you can afford to lose
  • This is NOT financial advice
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Lets hope that things work out for MagicDice. In my opinion the biggest risk with these gambling tokens is that the business model is very easy to copy.
We already are seeing the next competitor in the space SteemBet and the whole Token economics will start from beginning. That means most of the traffic that is currently gaming MC will be going to the new SteemBet site because their Token distribution just started. And when they are done than the next competitor comes and all the Gambling sites from before are not anymore of interest.
Thats what somehow happened to all this EOS / Tron gambling sites they lost most traffic to competition. I think DICE is the only one who really has a well developed gambling platform with different kinds of games and a great roadmap. So, longterm it really depends on great User interface, a lot of games, Brand recognition, marketing and collaborations.

That's true. The percentage of those who do not play but only farm tokens could also be high.

You mean the "Delegators" who earn MC for just delegating their SP.
Yeah, thats a unique thing about MC I haven't seen on other platforms but I guess with next halving the opportunity costs are rising exponentially. With the next halving you only get 0.5 MC per 1SP delegated e.g. 1000 SP you get 500 MC.
For me that is the point where I see more value in using my SP for other projects or general Voting than to further delegate it to MC. So, I think in the short and mid term the amount of delegators will be reduced dramatically.

No, I mean the players, who farm tokens by playing (me too). I have farmed 100k tokens with 5 Steem. I assume that a very high percentage is not currently playing, but farming tokens. That's okay. But you have to take it into account in the calculation.

As soon as the halving has reached an unattractive value, there will be no more farmers.

who do not play but only farm tokens.

haha I took you by yours words. Don't play but only farm tokens = Delegators
If you play with the purpose of farming tokens you are still playing the game and using the platform (wagering Steem).
I think you mean the players who only play because they see more potential in gaining the tokens than in actually winning by playing this game. Yes, with the next halving these players will disapear at some point and only return if the token is tradeable and has good value thru dividends.

Farmers are only active for a short period of time.

Drools .... I think we will see nice returns from MT and the 2% house edge is way better than what I pay in the local casino :)

Congratulations @cryptoeater! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 25000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 30000 upvotes.

Click here to view your Board
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Hi @cryptoeater!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.013 which ranks you at #3673 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 4 places in the last three days (old rank 3677).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 247 contributions, your post is ranked at #165.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Congratulations @cryptoeater!
Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

  • Pending payout - Ranked 3 with $ 65,64