Bitcoin and deflation.

in market •  7 years ago 


Fuente

*

*

When I started to study finance, one of the things that I had the hardest time understanding was deflation. Not so much its concept, but why it brings with it negative effects in the economy.

Deflation is the opposite of inflation and, therefore, as a phenomenon implies a generalized decline in the prices of goods and services or in the supply of a certain currency (which implies an appreciation of it).

Why is deflation negative for the economy?

Let's imagine that I have 100 pesos and I am able to buy 100 candies today. If there is inflation within a year I will be able to buy with those same 100 pesos less candy. But if there is deflation, I will be able to buy more. So, what ends up happening is that people tend not to spend, save those pesos instead of "buy candy" and lower consumption.

This is too simple an example and only illustrative, since the economic forces in practice are more complex.

Also, it is clear that the problems of money should not be measured in nominal but relative terms, and what ultimately matters is the real purchasing power (if the currency is deflationary but wages also fall in short I will be able to buy "less candies "with a month's salary that before).

Now, what I wanted to share with you this week was the following reflection.

One of the most outstanding qualities of the proponents of bitcoin is that the problem of inflation is eliminated, since the issue is defined in advance. Only 21 million bitcoins will be issued throughout history.

The issue is this: we must not forget that bitcoin is, above all, a system of decentralized payments.

In this context, if the virtual currency that serves that system is deflationary, that feature threatens consumption, putting the system itself in check.

In other words, if bitcoin increases its value constantly (if the demand of this cryptocurrency increases but its issuance remains fixed), who would be willing to spend their bitcoins to buy a good or a service?

What I want to say with all this, is that in the long term, the fixed issuance of a number of bitcoins established in advance, is a problem of opposite sign to the one that would bring an uncontrolled issue like that made by many central banks in the world.

My hypothesis in any case is that with bitcoin, or any other decentralized payment system, it may be more convenient to have a different issuance policy, which takes into account the changes in the demand of that virtual currency to adjust its issuance, instead to have a fixed number that remains unchanged over time.

This would be a way to encourage consumption and make people finally use the system for what was created, to trade goods and services without depending on intermediaries.

Request high / low of special tag in shouts to notify you of my posts on investments and personal finances, you only have to send me a private message with the request.

Invest in loans to people and / or companies

How to invest in loans from $ 5000 and earn money
How to invest from home in Argentine agriculture from 1000 dollars
TuTasa: New fintech for loans between people

Simplified analysis for new equity investors
Invest in stock exchange: Beginners guide
Actions: Trading psychology
How to choose an action to invest in the stock market?
I learned to invest in a stock market with a simulator
How to buy and sell shares in the Merval
CEDEARs: what are, pros and cons of investing in them
Tips to build your first bond portfolio
Tips to understand and operate bonds
Invest in bonds that adjust for inflation
How to invest in LEBACS
How much would you earn by investing in LEBACS?
Invest in Securitization or Fixed Term Bond
Invest pesos in bonds to receive dollars
Options to put dollars to work

Invest in cryptocurrencies

Buy gold with bitcoins / card / bank transfer online
Ethereum: To know before investing in Ether

Other investment alternatives

Migo: Invest from home in business ventures
Sesocio: Invest and earn money in Argentina from home
Short-term securities: Option to earn in dollars
Advantages of UVIS and UVAS versus the traditional fixed term
How to buy gold coins in Argentina

I learned to make money investing in Whiskey

How to invest 15,000 pesos in Argentina?
Invest easily in real estate projects of 25000 pesos How to buy cheap merchandise from customs?
Invest and earn money in Argentina as a partner from home Financial education Easily teach your child the value of things The 10 principles of investment Do you earn less than 15 thousand pesos? I learned to multiply 7 fundamental tips so you do not miss the money It's never too late to learn how to invest How to stop surviving between salary and salary Do you want to have your first credit card? How to be happy with minus 10 common mistakes of the investors 7 steps to manage your finances easily 7 habits that affect your money The trap of the minimum payment of the credit cards.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You have a minor grammatical mistake in the following sentence:

What I want to say with all this, is that in the long term, the fixed issuance of a number of bitcoins established in advance, is a problem of opposite sign to the one that would bring an uncontrolled issue like that made by many central banks in the world.
It should be in the long run instead of in the long term.

you are right and I apologize for my grammatical errors I will try to correct it as soon as possible