I am assuming C is being used as a constant and not as fractions of a constant. If the latter is true then I have learned something today. Thanks for your reply.
RE: E=Mc2 Proved wrong in under 5 mins
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
E=Mc2 Proved wrong in under 5 mins
c is defined as a constant in our universe. Since you are changing to a universe where c=1, I'm adding another where c=0.5. That was my point. :)
Basically, it doesn't matter what c is - the equation will apply. If the c were 1, it's only a co-incidence that e=m.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yes i see , oh well back to the drawing board :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have been under the impression that we should always use the constant C in that equation not any fraction of C you like.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly. And c = 299,792,458. Not 1.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's only 299,792,458 because thats the way we measure it if we measured it in fraction of the speed of light then it would be 1. If changing the measurement system can cause the equation to go from e=mc2 to e=m then it was always e=m . Why can't I change the Pythagorean equation by changing how i measure things.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit