“Dr” Peter McCullough is one of the biggest politically motivated quacks out there.
People consider him an expert on Covid even though he literally has no infectious disease training nor expertise in vaccines.
He literally continues to push a crazy cocktail to prevent/cure Covid that have shown no empirical evidence in any studies conducted.
The only thing he is right about are monoclonal antibodies, and that’s already the general medical consensus anyways.
He literally quotes VAERs data as actual scientific data meaning he should not be taken seriously.
He ignores the fact that blood clots are far worse from outright Covid infections than the low risk of blood clots from the vaccines.
He continues to claim that the virus was, 100% sure without a doubt, released by the wuhan lab even though we will probably never have empirical evidence to prove it. No, we don’t KNOW this for a fact Mr Quack.
He clearly ignores all the private lab studies going on across the globe that disprove his ridiculous idea that the Covid-19 vaccines have less than a 1% efficacy rate.
He’s one of the least scientific people out there. He’s literally a quack. It upsets me that people actually think this guy knows what he's talking about when really he's just a huge quack.
How quacky mr quack actually is :
believes that the impact of COVID-19 vaccines will be less than 1% because he says that the attack rate in the original clinical trials was less than 1%
pushes the idea of artificially low vaccine efficacy rates… has he seen the reports about breakthrough infections?
brings up the 1976 swine flu pandemic, saying the program was killed after 500 cases of GBS and 25 deaths, except for the fact that there was no evidence of swine flu transmission and that year had more to do with ending the program early more than anything else
tries to compare yearly flu vaccine deaths in VAERS to COVID-19 vaccine deaths in VAERS, apparently not understanding that COVID-19 vaccines initially went to older folks with the highest mortality rates
pushes the idea of a “scrubbing” of COVID vaccine deaths and that the Trusted News Initiative, instead of combating fake news and misinformation, is somehow hiding the “truth” about COVID-19 vaccines because they are worried about vaccine hesitancy. I guess that’s why they didn’t publish stories about anything negative about vaccines, like blood clots and the Janssen vaccine pause?!? Oh wait, they did…
says that the risk of blood clots from the mRNA vaccines are 30 times that of the J&J vaccine, even though those vaccines don’t have any extra risk of blood clots and natural COVID infections have high risk of blood clots!
repeats the myth that 60 to 70% of COVID patients are vaccinated
states that the COVID-19 vaccines only provide narrow immunity against the original wild strain of SARS-CoV-2, I guess missing all of the studies that have shown that they provide immunity against most of the new variants
misinterprets why a COVID-19 vaccine trial in Australia was stopped after participants developed false positive HIV tests, stating that it was because “code for the virus, parts of the code that were attempted to be used in an Australian vaccine turned HIV tests positive.” In reality, it was not the code for SARS-CoV-2 virus, but part of a HIV virus protein that caused the problem with that vaccine.
pushes the idea that vaccines may be dangerous or are wasted on people who have already had COVID-19, even though studies are showing that they have an even greater immune response that folks who were uninfected
has testified before the HHS committee that India has few COVID-19 deaths because they give everyone hydroxychloroquine first line with other drugs, which doesn’t explain all of the deaths in their new COVID wave…
even brings up the Nuremberg Code…
and of course, Peter McCullough thinks that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a manufactured virus, that Dr. Fauci was “at the scene of the crime,” and that this was “probably bioterrorism that went wrong…”