RE: When people stop blaming objects for the actions of reckless or evil people, there can be a greater sense of sanity in the world. #2a #gunrights #shallnotbeinfringed #guns #boogaloo

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

When people stop blaming objects for the actions of reckless or evil people, there can be a greater sense of sanity in the world. #2a #gunrights #shallnotbeinfringed #guns #boogaloo

in meme •  5 years ago 

Ah, so you and your lot are advocating rule by force alone. I am sure the idiot libertarian who set-up his utopia leeching-off the Thai economy exercised his "right" to defend himself; more like the "right" to die while being absolutely mental. Under your system of non-governance, the only reason why the pirates do not rape your wife, eat your children, and burn your house down is because they haven't found you yet.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The fact that you think roving gangs are numerous enough to pose a significant threat to everyone says something about you. You sound like one of those religious apologists who claim that we can't be moral without someone else telling us what to do. This is the reason anarchists say that statism is a religion. I'm sorry if the lack of a police state ruined your country, but that doesn't mean a police state is the solution to everything.

You are yet another disciple of Rousseau's failed and false idea of "natural morality" of men. You are either ignorant or willfully denying the consequence of allowing humanist fanaticism to undermine sociocultural restraints. The Terror, Paris Commune, or the numberless humanist revolutions of the past 2 centuries demonstrates the delusion of "natural morality" in men. In fact, any sane man observing 2-year olds interacting would realise the insanity of Rousseau and his disciples' claims. Morality is not an instinctual phenomenon; it must be taught. The one under the sway of blind faith is you and your humanist fanatics.

If you think British parliamentary system is equivalent to Stalinist totalitarian state, then you ought to check yourself into a mental institution for therapy. Just because sane men refuse to live in Lord of the Flies type social construct does not make them apologists for totalitarianism.

No rule. Not by anything or anyone. No one has the right to govern another person, because that "right" can't exist.
And I didn't say anything about non-governance-- I advocate post-political governance. Governance without the unethical, antisocial stuff that is politics. Market governance uses the economic means and is ethical.
If you believe the State protects you, I guess you believe the cattleman is the cow's protector, too. (Until butchering day, anyway.)