Living with Mindfulness: Responding vs Reacting

in mindfulness •  8 years ago 

I think we pretty much all know the feeling: Something unexpected-- that's usually also a setback-- comes up... or someone says something that really annoys us and rubs us the wrong way... and we feel a sudden "heat" rising up inside... maybe our feelings are really hurt.

What happens next?

Do you react to the person/situation, or do you respond? And what is the difference, anyway?

The vast majority of the world tends to be quite reactive. When they encounter something that shakes their fundamental beliefs or ideas or plans... they tend to "react in the moment," without much thought to the impact their words or actions might have.

0099-PinkFlower.jpg

Some argue it's "just natural," and will often say they had "no choice," but often the outcome of "reacting" can cause quite a few more problems than the original situation warranted. Reacting tends to "interrupt" others... and often puts us in a frame of mind where we become cognitively deaf and unable hear anything but our own point of view.

As I said before, some argue "but I can't HELP it!" as a way to justify and rationalize their reactive outbursts... but is that really true?

The Danger of Responding to a Memory

The ironic thing is that a lot of people who seem "reactive" are actually responding to a memory, or to something in their past-- not at all to the current situation.

This cognitive blindness-- leading to reactivity-- is particularly true when it comes to "taboo" topics like religion, politics or money.

How so? Well, someone might be saying something completely harmless and kind to us... but because they "fit in a particular group" we have previously determined (ahead of time) that we dislike, we don't even hear them; they could be offering us $1000 in cash, and we still bristle at their very presence.

"Responding" in tense and difficult situations seems to come naturally to a few people... for many of us, it's a learned skill to "pause and consider" before either blurting out the first thing that comes to mind, or taking the first action we can think of.

0099-YellowFlower.jpg

The old idea of "counting to ten" before acting on something is an early example of how we can teach ourselves not to "react." It gives us the necessary time break to allow us to think about what we're going to do or say next.

Most things are NOT Personal!

One of the challenges we face is that we tend to "take things personally" when we hear something we don't agree with... or that might even be counter to our core beliefs or values.

Most of the time, however, these statements are not personal. Most people are far too wrapped up in their own dilemmas and phobias to go out of their way to deliberately insult you... most such situations happen inadvertently. People are simply stating their opinion, not launching an "attack" on us.

Responding can be tricky because it asks us to truly listen to the other person's point of view, while suspending our own judgment until we have deliberated a bit on what was said. It also asks us to be open to the possibility that the other person is actually right, at least based on their perspective and experience.

Learning to RESPOND to close family... instead of fighting

Responding, rather than reacting, can be particularly challenging when it comes to people we know well-- especially family members. Why?

0099-WhiteJasmine.jpg

Mostly because we tend to have already "made up our mind" about them... and so we tend to be somewhat closed off to the possibility that they might actually have something worthwhile to offer. Aside from the possibility that they might have learned something new since we last "argued" five years ago... merely approaching a dialogue from a place of wanting to understand their point of view can change the entire dynamic of the interaction to where "fighting" is no longer necessary.

Similarly, we also must be particularly mindful around people who don't share our political or religious beliefs... we often fall into the habit to "pre-judging" them based on their core beliefs ALONE... so we don't really hear them, regardless of what they are saying.

In case it sounds like I'm suggesting we need to "turn the other cheek," or "roll over and play dead," I am definitely not! I'm merely opening the possibility that there's a solution in "agreeing to disagree" from a place of mutual understanding.

Yes, some people are "hard nuts to crack," but at least you'll be able to walk away from the situation knowing that you did your part to communicate mindfully.

What do YOU think? Are you more likely to react or respond? Do you wish you handled tense or confrontational situations better, or differently? Are you able to pause and listen to someone who's ideas and viewpoints are not like yours? Leave a comment and share your experiences-- start the conversation!

(As always, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Living in a foreign country and communicating primarily in a second language has helped me become more responsive. Before I can react and be communicative I have to think about how I can say what I want to say. Usually situations that create this scenario push me outside of my typical language abilities, so sometimes I can't easily formulate what I want to say, which leads me to evaluate the entire situation and how best to respond.

Though I do still react in my native language, especially with my children, I'm much better at catching myself doing so now and changing to a more responseful approach.

Nice article. Thanks!

Wow... yes, I imagine having to process in another language adds a whole new dimension of needing to "stop and understand" before you can respond appropriately. Probably good practice in just "slowing down."

The ironic thing is that a lot of people who seem "reactive" are actually responding to a memory, or to something in their past-- not at all to the current situation.

Excellent Eye-Opener article @denmarkguy
That bit I quoted above is fundamental to understand an awful lot of things. I suspect, I am one of those on the reacting team more than anything also. But then, I'm afraid, the ones into the lineup of "but I can't HELP it!" are indeed a shocking crowded majority anyway.

However, I think we actually need to be very aware about the following:
"Most people do not listen with the intent to understand, they listen with the intent to reply"

Therefore, I still wonder ¿Which would be the best way to 'react' when someone is asking & awaiting for your reply ¡Right Away! in the course of a conversation?
Because in this case, we also should be very aware about this bit below:
"It takes 3-6 seconds for silence to become awkward"

Good post mate. Upvoted & Resteemed!! :)

Thanks for your comment and resteem! Glad you got something useful from the article.

Learning to truly listen is surprisingly difficult. We think we know how, but much of the time I also catch myself in what you shared: "listen with the intent to reply."

When people are trying to "rush" me for a response (or "provoke a reaction") I tend to come back to them with something along the lines of "That's a really good/interesting question!" as a means to slow down the pace of the dialogue until I can think through what I want to respond with. If people aren't willing to wait for that, then maybe I am best off not saying anything at all.

That's indeed a very wise and zen strategy @denmarkguy, which I'm still not so sure if it would be so effective in the middle of a true boiling conversation in front of a demanding interlocutor always reluctant to exchange shoes with us to see the things from a different perspective and yet insisting on quick replies & instant enlightenment. Hehehe

But since I'm kind of a curious daredevil experimentalist, I guess I will give to your recommendation a try. :)

Great post! We all need to engage like this more often! Responding, self-responsibility, tolerance, not taking things so personally.

It's not always easy to be accountable for ourselves and what we say! You see it a lot, even in written venues like Steemit or Facebook, where people just "go off" on each other without really giving much time to consider what effect their words might have.

Yes so very true...but if we intend and try to reach for something else, this "going off" will happen less frequently.

Thank you for this! :)

You're welcome-- glad you found it useful.

I really appreciate the reminder that most things are not personal. Its a very freeing thought.

The idea is partly "borrowed" from Don Miguel Ruiz's "The Four Agreements," which I have also found very useful in helping deal with "tense" situations.

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Apr 20. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $1.82 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 20 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Thanks!