That is why we recommend that you do P2P vote selling. Curation rewards for P2P go to the voter, the delegation bot is just a helper and will make less profit.
RE: HF 21 - P2P Vote Selling IS Better than Bot Delegation!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
HF 21 - P2P Vote Selling IS Better than Bot Delegation!
Mmm, to bad.
I really hoped MB would nutralised the HF change in the math used.
So things wouldn't change for buyer/delegator/MB.
After HF21:
Buyer = gets the same
Delegator = gets less
MB = gets more
Doesn't sound right/fair does it?
Btw. I don't want to use the P2P system be cuase it doenst use all the Voting Power available. Thus wasting VP / ROI / chance to auto-upvote awesome content...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We are currently evaluating ways to make delegation worthwhile again, but we don't plan to do the whole powerdown into payout thing, as it complicates and drags out payments a lot.
If P2P does not use all the voting power you allow it to, then that is a bug and you can tell us so we will investigate. If you set it to keep your VP at say 90% then it will do that +- 2% or so. And if not, come to us and we investigate/fix.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Update: we decided to not take our 15% share if we receive the curation rewards. That way delegators get the consistent payments and we average out on the long term curation rewards, which would fluctuate more and are a bigger risk.
With that in mind, delegating to @minnowbooster should with HF21 be very profitable :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the update!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit