lol geesh. I don't agree on inheritance, it's none of anyone's business what you inherit. Even if you do nothing for it, it is their right to gift it to you if you are willing to accept it. If you want to give it up fine, but no one has the right to take it from you just because they think you may not have earned it. No unfair advantage in receiving a gift. Do you apply this to charities too? If a charity receives a large gift, does that put it at an advantage over other charities, and therefore should be taken from them by force? And if charity is Okay, who is to say that you may not chose to spend part or all of your inheritance on charity, is that portion of your inheritance now not subject to being seized?
RE: Doug Casey and I Destroying Commies On Universal Income
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Doug Casey and I Destroying Commies On Universal Income
I'm not really seeing any point in continuing this as you are in complete denial that about 6000 business people now own over 80% of the wealth of the planet and that disparity of opportunity is being severely compromised by this hoarding by ALL the many unfair ways they've rigged the global casino.
The difference between me and you is you only scapegoat one actor in this tragedy:guvment......I suggest that there are many many bad actors involved in this whole bloody mess.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's okay, i enjoyed it. As long as you got my memo about the calculation problem. Thanks for chatting, cheers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit