You gotta stop upvoting bimbos if you want this site to work!

in money •  8 years ago  (edited)


First, let me make something clear.  There's two different kinds of bimbos, one is alright, the other is a problem:


1)  Productive Bimbos

2)  Parasitic Bimbos


I mean, you click a girl like this Tara makeup tutorial girl.  At first glance you're thinking, now that's a bimbo, but not so fast.  I've clicked the Youtube before and delved into the scary world of women.  I was horrified to see there was a humongous audience for stuff like this.  Same thing with this Heidi wants room service travel girl.


Whatever your interests are, even if you don't like something, there's always a chance there's some audience out there for it.  For these two broads, they're actually putting in the work to create content.  If I was their handler, I would just be like, good job bitch, get back out there on the street and let's make some money!


As for the other category, you got some other girls that are just like - here's a picture of me, and me, and me me me me me me, give me some money.  There is no fucking content in this.  People are actually upvoting parasitic bimbos.  Even other women who are naturally inclined to whoring themselves will see things like this and be put off by the site.  It's not a good strategy for anyone.


So basically, it's not really if you think it's cool or not, or judging the quality of someone's character, it's the effort and content put out by the person that counts.





Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

It's a very exploitable vector as well:

Quote from a btctalk user:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558366.msg15699412#msg15699412

"Btw I made 5k by posting fake intro post, I created 4 bogus profil, took photos of travel and stuff from facebook wrote a few things and made over 1000$ per post on average, some users asked me some proof which i ignored. Only thing i had to do was to order 5 sim ( in UK u can get as much as you want) so yeah pretty good site"

This guy you quoted was trolling and FUDing from day one, I'm not saying what he claims is not possible but I will believe this specific person only when and IF he provides some proofs.

It's quite possible - haven't tracked his history.

Bimbo-ing intensifies

YES

And you've got to stop Tag spamming if you want this site to work! Use the appropriate tags that suit your post please!

"For these two broads...."

Why not triple?

Seemed gratuitous--you only have so much Picard in a day (you have to use them wisely).

You should probably qualify the word "bimbo". Some girls enjoy being dolled up which has no effect on their intelligence.

We're in the Al Bundy era now, no need for all this qualifying stuff. That was all tossed out with 38th wave feminism.

Best bimbo-related post in a long while.

And here you have it! A bimbo complaining about bimbos! And getting upvotes for it! I will never understand why stupid posts get upvoted so much! Tsk,Tsk!

Same bullshit as seen on TV. Claim something is "offensive" so it can't possibly be true! It doesn't matter if you think it's offensive. You can claim the sky being blue is offensive. The sky does not care.

  ·  8 years ago Reveal Comment

Then I just flag you for excessive misandry. See how this works now? Your politically correct SJW shit is dead. It's like voodoo. You have 0 power unless people believe your lies. Gone are the days of Marxists , communists, and liberals (same thing) being able to use tricks like that as a political weapon.

None of the people who reside at the top of the monetary and political pyramid of life actually are SJWs, you just do their bidding for them involuntarily. They call those useful idiots.

How am I a liar? Are you trying to say there is nothing sexist about referring to women in the way this post does?

You can call anything you want "misogynist" and I can call anything you say misandry. All it is is a tool to try and censor the opposition. You are unable to formulate any kind of valid point, so that is the strategy you used.

No the post IS misogynistic and stating that as I did is NOT misandry. It's not about censorship, if anything it's a tool to point out that using childish sexist language weakens whatever point you were trying to make. In future try to formulate your valid points in a way that is not offensive to half the human population.

BTW flagging is hardly going to bother anyone with no steam power to speak of .