Anyone Familiar with Martin Armstrong? The Computer that predicts the World Economy!

in money •  7 years ago 

I have been following him for many years, had I listened to him since the 80's I would have been a rich man. I followed his trial, his attempted murder in jail, his coma they put him in, his attempted robbery of Socrates program by the government. I watched is movie when it came out, talked to people in line who stated they never need to work again, by following his instructions.

I read his site every day with the multiple posts he writes. I send him articles that he breaks down then articulates it into a real story. I am about to join his Socrates program for $14.95 a month and see if it works. MY ONLY PROBLEM WITH HIM IS... I SENT him many articles involving #pizzagate #pedogate, he claimed it was fake news. Disappointing. He is very close to governments, they ask him for information about the future. The economy, money, currencies, etc. The pedophilia thing really bothers me, especially when you hear about kids snatched off the streets and many countries, then used as animals,...nobody seems to do anything about it. I was hoping Martin Armstrong would open his mouth about such horrible events.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I have seen quite a few interviews with Martin Armstrong. And others commenting on him. In particular Bill Holter has said some interesting things about him. There are suggestions that he 'cut some kind of deal' to ultimately get out of prison, and so he is not as free as he might be on certain topics. I myself am not too sure about that though.

He seems to me to be sincere in what he says about gold price moves. It is just that he cites examples going all the way back to such as the Roman Empire to justify what he thinks is going to happen in our time. Now I know that history repeats. It is just that, with technological developments, some of what he says just may seem a bit off. For example, we can talk about historical gold/silver ratios. But what if new technologies non-existent in the past make silver even more important as a resource than gold? This could mean ratios are realised not based upon historical precident. This is just an example.