I think a high target will encourage user's that they too could make 30k from quality posts. It is like the idea of lottery, play for the money, come back after seeing the jackpot on a billboard. I wish more smaller posters could also gain a profit, but I don't think we should restrict the community if they truly believe that one or two articles should get all the attention or just a dozen or thousands. Thanks!
RE: Suggested steemit have a maximum of $ 500 or less per post avoiding fast devaluation of currency.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Suggested steemit have a maximum of $ 500 or less per post avoiding fast devaluation of currency.
I tell you that in a week we will have the currency below one US dollar and down and down....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well if you believe that then do not invest. I haven't made huge amounts of money, but I have made a great deal of money compared to anything in the social media industry. I believe that this will attract people a lot more whether or not user's are capped. And I would believe you are taking away the voter's power if you are telling them they no longer can give credit to this poster.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the same amount of money is being distributed regardless. Supply change is constant. It just is more or less concentrated.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit