It was good.
It either needed to be three hours longer or thirty minutes shorter.
The performances were all great. If anybody is gonna beat Emily Blunt for best supporting actress, it should be Vanessa Kirby.
This movie should have been shot on film.
Seriously, I don't care if they needed to go with 8mm to get it under budget. This needed to be on film.
Bottom line, this was a good movie that left me with the question, "What was this all about?"
I know that it's a story about an important person in history; but, what was this about in the Roddenberry sense?
I don't know.
I don't know what this movie was telling me about the human condition. I came away with little more than a historically accurate portrayal of the battle of Waterloo.
For that, I could just rewatch the film Waterloo.
Again, it's good.
It's amazing that a man in his mid-80s has the energy to make something like this. It's not his best, but, it's worth a look.